top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 112 points 1 year ago (16 children)

People really trust it? Like it’s been so wrong on things for me, I automatically skip to search results past it. Why bother anymore

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    google search has been trash even before llms, i believe its one of the reasons chatgpt got so much traction. first 2 pages are just generic slop with paywalled or ad-infested content.

    i switched to kagi 2 years ago and its has relevant results on page 1 that i won’t get in google even after 10s of pages. plus i don’t bombed with ads for that term for weeks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I still find it weird that people don’t use Kagi for search. At least start page or ddg. Google hasn’t been useful for five ish years and admitted in court that they damaged results to prop up ads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 98 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Which is such a shortsighted move because as soon as all the news portals close shop Google's scraper will have nothing relevant to summarize and is gonna be shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Nothing is stopping the AI summaries from using social media as the primary source

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Can't wait for Google to AI-summarize AI-generated social media posts for artificial Google users created to hike ad prices. It's gonna be wild

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    So social media are news outlets now. Good. Glad we cleared that up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    In the context of my original comment, social media companies like Meta and Reddit have fought tooth and nail to not be considered news networks or news outlets specifically because they don't want to be beholden to the laws that regulate news outlets/networks. Jeopardizing their ineligibility to be sued for what users post (in the US) by going all in on AI LLM's scrapers when those scrapers rely pretty heavily on news networks and other media to stay useful means they'll starve themselves of AI scraped content, and that they'll potentially forfeit what protections against lawsuits they have. It's a no win situation for them to continue to bet on AI which has already largely reached the limit of what it's capable of in current iterations because of the lack of clean organic training data.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    It's a huge disaster in the making. There's probably a game theory model that explains what's happening but damned if i know it. AI is a trap.

    At the beginning of LLMs as a consumer tech phase, the big tech companies believed that they would soon generate synthetic data without human labor costs. But synthetic data caused model collapse when used as training data. So they still need humans.

    But now their competitors are using scrapers and summarizers and those are expensive so they have to extract more value from search traffic and that means fewer referrals to sites. Fewer referrals to sites reduces original content and leadabto less traffic and training data for their models.

    The only two ways out are to create an international regulatory body ornto break up facebook, microspft, and google.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I do respect your optimism, but realistically, I doubt they're forfeiting anything. Fox News broadcasts blatant lies daily. All they had to do was a behind the scenes rebranding.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Watch his recent interview with Nilay Patel from The Verge. Watching him dance around questions about this was painful.

    This man only cares about increasing Alphabet stock prices to ensure as large a golden parachute as possible on the way out.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This man only cares about increasing Alphabet stock prices to ensure as large a golden parachute as possible on the way out.

    This Is literally his legal obligation, welcome to capitalism

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    No, making money is not a legal obligation. CEO at my last job told the board, two years in a row, that intended to lose money so we could invest in our people and tech. They cheered him.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    The sad part is this is actually his job description and Alphabet could get sued by shareholders if he didn‘t do exactly that. The stock market needs to be criminalized, not glorified as the one truth like it‘s treated right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 43 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I'd say their decision making was mostly forced by their drop in ad revenue and subscriptions forced by the internet.

    Though I do wish that someone would make a Spotify for news so that I could pay once and get access to all of them and at least give them 10 cents per article or something, because I will never pay the subscription cost any are asking.

    As much as I'd like to support them, the price to utility ratio is way the fuck off at the prices they ask now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Wouldn't this kill their ad revenue? Which is like...most of their revenue?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Ad supported articles is a dead industry, Google realizes this better than anyone. People don't go to the source anymore to answer curiosities, why would you read a whole article to answer a simple question when AI gives you the answer directly?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    “Every day, we send billions of clicks to websites, and connecting people to the web continues to be a priority,” a Google spokesperson said in a statement. “New experiences like AI Overviews and AI Mode enhance Search and expand the types of questions people can ask, which creates new opportunities for content to be discovered.”

    They followed up with: “You can totally trust me, and everything I just said. I am absolutely definitely not lying.”

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    With a link to NYPost lol

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    With what passes for news these days at most outlets I can't say I feel too bad for them that someone else beat them at their own game of feeding the masses surface level doom scrolling slop for engagement and ad impressions.

    Hell, a large chunk of the junk being put out by these same outlets is trash written by the AI solutions they are paying for. Probably solutions from the likes of Google that is giving it to them at both ends.

    Once the snake finishes eating its own tail maybe the good reporters will still have somewhere that pays them for the good work they do.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Google wants it all this time. No traffic for anyone but them after they steal all your content.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    No! Pushing AI generated garbage is our job!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Glad this is happening. These are the same news outlets that provide Google with your information and pay Google for ads.

    They can all bust for all I care.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›