top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 110 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The perfect material for Tesla’s new cyberboat

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 109 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    I feel like soluble plastic can't be a good thing actually

    Edit: the plastic chemically decomposes in water, it does not dissolve

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 127 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Looks like it's not an issue fortunately.

    Aida said the new material is as strong as petroleum-based plastics but breaks down into its original components when exposed to salt. Those components can then be further processed by naturally occurring bacteria, thereby avoiding generating microplastics that can harm aquatic life and enter the food chain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yeah I reacted to the title and then read the article and edited lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Given the username, the immediate emotional reaction when expecting damage to ocean life is understandable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So using this for frozen foods, or takeaway containers isn’t advised. Those are basically all sodium.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 77 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    It dissolves...but into what? Sounds like a recipe for a petroleum salt water mix that's probably just as toxic as melted plastic, unless all the petroleum is removed.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    It doesn’t seem to be based on petroleum, since they’re explicitly comparing it to petroleum-based plastics…

    There also are other non-petroleum based plastics that dissolve in water. This part is not new. E.g. polyvinyl alcohol is used widely.

    What’s new about this one is that it specifically needs salt to dissolve and they claim it’s otherwise relatively sturdy. So maybe it could be used instead of pet bottles for drinks? Or maybe they’re not quite there yet but it’s a new step in that direction…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    There's a lot of sodium in most fizzy drinks, wonder if that rules them out for this. Or does it have to be sodium chloride specifically?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Without checking out the details, I can say with fairly high confidence that a material that will be degraded by a sodium chloride solution will most likely also be degraded by other electrolytes as well.

    However, the electrolyte-concentration in drinks is much, much lower than that in seawater. And if it can't be used for electrolyte-containing drinks, it could be used for water bottles.

    Maybe we could use this stuff for umbrellas too? My major concern is what this new material is broken down into.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 50 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    This sounds borderline miraculous, and I have a feeling there's bound to be a catch. I hope not, but I'm just too cynical.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think some of y'all are missing a lot of packaging use cases other than food. But even in the food sector, there are dry things like pasta, beans, and rice that don't have salt in them. If it really is as strong as a petroleum plastic for these items, it could eliminate tons of micro plastic.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 29 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    And are we gonna start using this on a mainstream scale?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    The material can be used like regular plastic when coated,

    Coated with what? If you say PFAS, this is worse than microplastics.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    What does it dissolve into? 🪿 Wait, what does it dissolve into? 🗣️ 🪿

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    From the article:

    Aida said the new material is as strong as petroleum-based plastics but breaks down into its original components when exposed to salt. Those components can then be further processed by naturally occurring bacteria, thereby avoiding generating microplastics that can harm aquatic life and enter the food chain.

    As salt is also present in soil, a piece about five centimetres (two inches) in size disintegrates on land after over 200 hours, he added.

    The material can be used like regular plastic when coated, and the team are focusing their current research on the best coating methods, Aida said. The plastic is non-toxic, non-flammable, and does not emit carbon dioxide, he added.

    So I think the next thing the goose wants to know is, what's it being coated with?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago*

    This seems like it could be a viable replacement for many plastics, but it isn't the silver bullet I feel that the article is acting as if it is.

    From the linked article in the post:

    the new material is as strong as petroleum-based plastics but breaks down into its original components when exposed to salt.

    Those components can then be further processed by naturally occurring bacteria, thereby avoiding generating microplastics

    The plastic is non-toxic, non-flammable, and does not emit carbon dioxide, he added.

    This is great. Good stuff. Wonderful.

    From another article (this shows that this isn't as recent, too. This news was from many months ago)

    the team was able to generate plastics that had varying hardnesses and tensile strengths, all comparable or better than conventional plastics.

    Plastics like these can be used in 3D printing as well as medical or health-related applications.

    Wide applications and uses, much better than a lot of other proposed solutions. Still good so far.

    After dissolving the initial new plastic in salt water, they were able to recover 91% of the hexametaphosphate and 82% of the guanidinium as powders, indicating that recycling is easy and efficient.

    Easy to recycle and reclaim material from. Great! Not perfect, but still pretty damn good.

    In soil, sheets of the new plastic degraded completely over the course of 10 days, supplying the soil with phosphorous and nitrogen similar to a fertilizer.

    You could compost these in your backyard. Who needs the local recycling pickup for plastics when you can just chuck it in a bin in the back? Still looking good.

    using polysaccharides that form cross-linked salt bridges with guanidinium monomers.

    Polysaccharides are literally carbohydrates found in food.

    This is really good. Commonly found compound, easy to actually re-integrate back into the environment. But now the problems start. They don't specify much about the guanidinium monomers in their research in terms of which specific ones are used, so it's hard to say the exact implications, but...

    ...they appear to often be toxic, sometimes especially to marine life, soil quality, and plant growth, and have been used in medicine with mixed results as to their effectiveness and safety.

    I'm a bit disappointed they didn't talk about this more in the articles, to be honest. It seems this would definitely be better than traditional plastic in terms of its ecological effects, but still much worse than not dumping it in the ocean at all. In my opinion, in practice it looks like this would simply make the recycling process much more efficient (as mentioned before, a 91% and 82% recovery rate for plastics is much better than the current average of less than 10%) while reducing the overall harm from plastic being dumped in the ocean, even if it's still not good enough to eliminate the harm altogether.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Aida said the new material is as strong as petroleum-based plastics but breaks down into its original components when exposed to salt.

    If this means that it does not break down when exposed to just water, that's a pretty big deal. Water solubility has been the major issue making biodegradable plastics useless for food packaging (typically you want to either keep the food wet and water in, or dry and water out - either way water permeability is a problem).

    Of course most foods also contain salt, so... I guess that's why the article talks about coatings. If the material has to be coated to keep it from breaking down too fast, what is the point? either the coating will prevent it from breaking down, or it just moves the problem to the coating not breaking down.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Does it actually break down? Or does it just melt into a cloud of microplastics?

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You see the thing is, the point of plastic is that it doesn’t dissolve easily. I can see this having some niche applications, but this won’t be replacing most plastics any time soon.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    To be fair, this was originally the point of plastic. The primary point of plastic today is that it is an extremely cheap material that you can mould into pretty much any shape.

    Need a bag to carry stuff? Plastic.

    Packaging for toothpicks? Plastic.

    Spacers inside an electric circuit? Plastic.

    Packaging for clothes? Plastic.

    Fake plant? Plastic.

    Part of the problem is that we're using a wonder-material that lasts forever (plastic) for a bunch of mundane shit where we don't need it, because that wonder-material turns out to be the cheapest material around as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • Its specifically sensitive to salt, so you can use it for anything with little or no salt without issue. Also it would be perfect for basically all packaging applications that dont involve food but do require an airtight seal. So you could probably replace the majority of all single use plastic packaging/containers with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Let’s build a ship out of it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I hope they can tune it to react only to a very specific type of salt water range or else it will not be applicable very often.

    And I love this. More if this please

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›