Personally, I want nothing to do with them and I'm not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I moved to the Fediverse to get away from all these corpos.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 27 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (10 children)

Judging from their past and all the bad actions they have done in the past, bad for democracy, privacy, minorities and marginalised people and how openly they have a far/extreme-right bias. Well I feel extremely negative about them joining in. They were also part of destruction of another open/federated protocol in the past: they played big part in destroying XMPP/Jabber messaging. So I am afraid they will do their usual embrace, extend, and extinguish thing and their surveillance capitalist thing and yeah. no good. Best to block their instances outright.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    My feeling about Meta joining the Fediverse is: 🚨DANGER!🚨

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    They are free to set up an instance. Not sure who would federate with them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    News story I looked up. Fuck Meta and all the other money-sucking bastards that want to commodify every breath I take.

    https://fediversereport.com/meta-plans-on-joining-the-fediverse-the-responses/

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Even if they were somehow not evil, the sheer volume would technologically destroy any instance that tried to federate with them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 3 years ago (5 children)
    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    I guess I'll just go back to reading books and watching movies full time.

    Fuck all of those tech giants.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    It's the old Microsoft strategy again - Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

    They deserve a good boot up the arse before they put one up our's.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I'm trying to get away from Facebook and meta. I'd rather they weren't remotely near me at all

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    They will datamine all federated users They will set up a CDN for uploads on their platform that will track you like v.meta.com or i.meta.com.

    They will probably train LLMs off the data. They will sell the data to advertisers or data brokers. They will most likely have ads or pay to boost.

    They will diverge from the standard once they have the majority of users like google does with chrome and the web.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Fuuuuuck no! This isn't actually happening right? This is just an idea I hope?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    They see the fediverse trend gain9ng steam with the rise of Mastodon and go "Oh sheit we need to be on that for $$$". Proceed to embrace, extend, enshittify, and extinguish. Its nothing but Zuckerberg's gasping breaths to try and stay relevant as his company begins the very slow, but inevitable, backslide into technological irrelevance.

    I will be leaving and/or blocking any instance that chooses to federate with anything related to Meta. They are antithetical to the entire foundation of the metaverse and they ruin everything they touch.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    keep corporations OUT

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    we shouldnt let them in. they would have done decentralized service years ago if there was money in it for them. They either want us to stop or try to seize control in only way that can -> by worming in.

    We must have zero-tolerance for corporations or we might as well just give up.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    Lmao want nothing to do with them. One of the reasons I’m here is to escape these dogshit corpos

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    I have to say, i don't like it, i mean i got here, because i didn't want to have anything to do anymore with them, but i guess if we are careful enough, they probably can't do to much to destroy our current fediverse.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    It's an easy fix. If an instance you're a part of federates with them then just move to a new instance.

    Hopefully this will put instance blocking on the top of the list.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (8 children)
    load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    To me it sounds like they are trying to Embrace, Extend, Extinguish the fediverse. I wouldn't doubt if at first they adopted it with all the standards then started doing proprietary crap

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    If Facebook behave and their instances have good moderation, they'll be successful. If they don't, they'll get defederated and turn into some niche twitter clone echo chamber like Truth Social.

    Facebook is a company with great open-source tech contributions (React, GraphQL) but absolutely awful products (Literally every social media thing they've got their hands on), which is why they are desperately trying to turn their side project Oculus into their main product. And I think they, as the original "The Social Network" company, see the writing on the wall: that they either embrace federation and decentralization, or get swept away by it into the footnote of social media history.

    Now, I don't think Facebook wants to JUST run an instance where they get to control everything. I think the most likely scenario is that Facebook will offer easy managed federated instance setup hosted on their own cloud servers for less tech inclined individuals and companies in the future, and they'll rebrand it as "the actual metaverse", which will finally end their tenure as an advertising company.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    I say we just don't allow them on most kbin/lemmy instances. Let the people decide what info is bullshit or not.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Give meta the boot

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    fuck that noise, absolutely do not federate with them

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    My problem with that is then the fediverse doesn't grow, meta controls the largest instance, and they make money off any posts that go viral here. I have to disagree for those reasons. They can go.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    For myself, I'm not a fan either. But I think it could be a very good thing for the fediverse (still not a fan of that word)


    which, as I understand it, is all about choice: the ability to easily access content across the fediverse, with the ability to ignore it just as easily.

    If it ends up breeding toxicity, then I'll block any subs, and possibly the whole instance†. And if it gets really bad, I'll just find a lemmy/mastodon/whatever instance that has defederated from them.

    † Sounds like this maybe isn't possible yet, but is being looked at https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2397

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    God fucking damn it. I wanted to get away from them.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago*

    Corporations already joined the federated internet when they adopted the web.

    Even if they wanted to, they can't take over the entire fediverse, that's the point.

  • source
  • Block them or I’m gone

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    They're trojan horse. We can't stop them from creating their own servers, but we can choose to defederate them. Up with the Anti-Meta Defederation Pact

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    In general, it's great when companies embrace standards and open source. Though in the case of Microsoft, they just did it to gain the market share (embrace, extend, extinguish).

    I'm under no illusion that they would be doing it out of the kindness of their hearts or desire to be compliant with standards.

    But..i also don't think I can criticize them yet for wanting to do so.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Will be interesting.
    More likely to be noticed by calckey,misskey/friendica users who are on platforms.more similar to Facebook. Probably noticed by Mastodon users.

    Not sure if kbin/Lemmy users will notice. This is based on me not noticing posts from these servers on Mastodon, calckey etc

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Mixed. On the positive, the fediverse is meant to be open for all, and the fact that it appeals to the corporate overlords means its demonstrated at least some degree of staying power. Further, this will bring far more people into the fediverse to interact and play with. On the negative, meta is a parasite, and most of us who are excited about the fediverse are going to gravitate to instances that defederate from Meta (and probably tumblr, too).

    So on the whole? Its a neutral thing

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    It's hard for me to see anything good coming from this.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί