top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 92 points 3 years ago (23 children)

I guess this is based on the idea that iPhones are expensive or exclusive? Or rather, some people think that iPhone owners think they're elite for having what is actually the most common phone in the US? They haven't been the most expensive phones on the market for at least 7 years.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 96 points 3 years ago (11 children)

    Americans flex about the weirdest things.

    The most common truck, the most common phone, food from the most ubiquitous fast food joint, having merch from the most popular artists and sports teams.

    Those are their biggest flexs.

    Yeah buddy, great flex with your Taylor swift hoodie, Starbucks frap, iPhone 12 in your Ford F-150.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 78 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I believe the point was "I am specifically asking for an iphone cable so you know that I have an iphone and not an inferior android", which is not actually a flex because nobody thinks iphone users are cool except iphone users.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 67 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    Who the hell asks for a cable as a flex?

    Who the hell has such an inferiority complex that they think someone asking for an iphone cable is a flex?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I once stubled across a girl on tinder who wouldn't date anyone who doesn't have an iphone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 57 points 3 years ago

    I remember when they switched from 30 pin to lightning when I was in highschool. It was the best time to be a little shit, whenever someone asked if you had an iphone charger you could ask what kind they need and then say you have neither.

  • source
  • [–] 56 points 3 years ago* (6 children)

    I have always had an Android phone, while my wife has had iPhones. Whenever one of the kids got old enough to get their own phone, they inherited hers and gave her an excuse to get a new iPhone. (Meanwhile I just traded mine in.)

    The unintentional result is that she can never find a charging cable or block for her phone because the kids keep taking them (and inevitably somehow breaking them), while I have a surplus of ways to charge my own. And also the kids' batteries are always low, because they can't figure out how to ration screen use with an old-ass worn out battery.

    So everyone else in the house is always squabbling about who took the charger, while I rarely see my phone dip below 50%. They hate it SO MUCH when I point this out. I swear I try not to smirk when I do.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I mean, your kids didn't choose to have an iphone, so it seems like kind of a dick move towards them specifically.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Well, we actually did give them the choice. They all chose iPhone, though I admit we encouraged that because it was simpler to lock those down and keep track of their location with them when they were younger.

    My oldest had his for a few years and switched to an Android when he became more tech savvy and realized that an Apple didn't afford him the customization he wanted and didn't mesh as well with the PC he built with his summer job money.

    I kind of like that we have an assortment of ecosystems in the house, because it exposes them to the advantages and drawbacks of each. Lord knows they hear me cussing out Windows often enough when I use the laptop, so maybe they'll be motivated to learn to use another OS when they're older.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 54 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    How is being a cableless beggar a flex?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 3 years ago* (41 children)

    While the lightning cable was ahead of its time when it came out, mostly because the USB consortium couldn't get its shit together, nowadays it's woefully inferior.

    Having said that, Apple has still managed to fuck their customers over by making so that only their overpriced "high speed" USB-C cables can work at anything better than USB 2.0 standard.

    I doubt that 3rd parties won't try to circumvent Apple's BS, but goes to show even the EU couldn't make Apple drop the act entirely.

    Edit: And that's not even talking about the wildly expensive lightning to USB-C converter they're selling to anybody desperate enough to hold onto their lightning cables

  • source
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • [+] 21 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (11 children)
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago* (7 children)

    Thankfully, they recently introduced logo requirements for this exact reason.

    In order to pass through the USB-IF Compliance Program, all USB-C® to USB-C cables categories must be labelled with either a power capability of 60W or 240W by using the appropriate power icon and/or logo. The USB-IF now requires that all cables must be labeled with the 60W or 240W logo prior to compliance testing so that testing can confirm the intended display of such icons/logos. The policy now extends to all USB-C to USB-C cables. These markings must be checked before compliance testing can begin.

    In addition to the power markings, in order to pass through the USB-IF Compliance Program, all cables except for High-Speed USB (USB 2.0) USB-C to USB-C cables, are required to be marked with the appropriate data rate they can support. An example, a USB 20Gbps USB-C – USB-C cable that supports 20V at 3A must be marked with the Combined Performance and Power 20Gbps/60W logo.

    Here's a table of the logos

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (29 replies)
    [–] 41 points 3 years ago (15 children)

    Literally it's just wealth peacocking and classism, that's it... people who are proud of owning an iphone are gross

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago* (5 children)

    There is more expensive and nicer built iPhones if you really care about blowing money, it's all so stupid.

    Also... Who cares? It's 2023 all phones pretty much do the same shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 38 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    They will also soon be forced to allow app sideloading. This might be huge and the only way I'd consider an iPhone

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 38 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Wait all the time iPhone users have been flexing?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 3 years ago*

    Even better when your mental idea of an iphone charger is a conector hanging from a wire with the insulation peeled.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (20 children)

    Apple introduced the Lightning connector with the iPhone 5 back in 2012. At the time, it was reversible and superior to the existing Micro-USB connectors. Having been manufactured of a single piece of metal, it was also more durable than the more complex USB connectors.

    The first USB-C phone was released in 2015. Samsung released their first USB-C phone, the infamous Galaxy Note 7 in 2016. Their flagship model didn’t use USB-C until 2017.

    I find the whole Lighting-hate thing slightly puzzling. Imagine that you come up with a technological solution that solves a problem. Years later, other people finally find a way to solve the same problem. Then they accuse you of being backward. Finally the use of your solution is declared illegal.

    Still, now that iPhone indeed has switched to USB-C, Apple's keyboards, headphones and touchpads should follow suit as soon as possible. It makes no sense for them to use Lightning anymore as the ecosystem around it is obsolete.

    Edit: another thing that I have found puzzling is how Apple is getting all the hate for proprietary standards, yet at the same time multiple other manufacturers have developed their own proprietary fast charging protocols which means you need both a proprietary cable and a proprietary charger to charge your phones to get charging speeds anywhere close to what is advertised. This was tested by for example Android Authority a few years back. To provide a more up-to-date example, OnePlus 10 Pro supports fast charging at 65 watts but only with its own ”SuperVooc” charger. If you try to charge through USB-PD, you are limited to 18 watts even though PD would theoretically support up to 240 watts. The SuperVooc chargers also refuse to charge any other device at a power higher than 10 watts. It’s interesting how this phenomenon has slipped under most people’s radar.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 3 years ago (11 children)

    A lot of the hate comes from apple having been a big supporter of the usb-c standard when it was developed, yet they still chose to go the anti-consumer route and stick with lightning for years after they already had a better cable. Now there's landfills of useless lightning cables, while we can still use micro-usb for a lot of other old devices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 27 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Lightning might've been somewhat better by itself for the years before USB C became ubiquitous (because it was doing some of what USB C is doing) - but even then it was Lightning (Apple only) versus Micro USB (practically any other phone). The EU forcing Apple to adopt USB C is a good thing for everyone (except Apple themselves probably - because they'll sell fewer special cables).

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 27 points 3 years ago (18 children)

    The flex is "i own an expensive phone" not the cable itself. Not that I think that is cool in any way, just explaining.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    I mean the most expensive phones are Androids nowadays, like the Galaxy Z Fold5 that starts at $1799 for the one with the smallest storage..

    iPhones are just more consistent pricing wise, though they also released budget versions by now, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 23 points 3 years ago

    Sadly, boomers are now referring to USB-C cables as "iPhone chargers"

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago

    Constantly having to charge your phone...not really a flex.

  • source
  • [+] 19 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)
    [–] 14 points 3 years ago

    Sent from my iPhone

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago

    Dumbest "meme" I've ever seen. Asking to borrow a cable has never been a flex in any way, whatsoever. The fact that this many people have even commented on this means you need to do something with ur lives. Let's try not to make Lemmy into Reddit, peeps.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    This not a meme. This is real shit

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›