▲ 14 ▼ Github - bugfishtm/bugfish-nuke: A Windows tool for emergency privacy: instantly deletes sensitive data and active logins to protect my information during unexpected searches or house warrants. (github.com) submitted 1 year ago by xpostml10@lemmings.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ca 8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago (11 children) Encrypt your darn data permalink fedilink source hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (10 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (9 children) That is assuming anyone still gives two hoots about your data by the time that lock can be cracked by anything that's not a supercomputer permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago* In a billion years I'm probably irrelevant. But is the data on my system right still relevant to anyone even in just 20 years time? I doubt it. No passwords or tokens will be valid anymore. Worst case they see some family photos or old browser history permalink fedilink source parent [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (6 children) Modern solutions for modern problems, ie, update as needed (and algorithms potentially invented) Alternatively hide it under the floorboards, with a nail over it and a hammer nearby as needed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children) I was by no means saying this is an 'after breach' scenario. Modern solutions don't save you retroactively, that wasn't the point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Sorry, I don't mean to say it's unnecessary in the event of a breach, you're absolutely correct there, I was just spitballing on the idea of encryptions without self-destruct buttons in majority non I-am-highly-targeted-by-CIA scenarios, how vigilant you'd have to be. With house warrants for instance, I was like "well, as the likelihood of them going being able to decrypt increases you should be on the look-out for alternative methods or harder encryption yeah" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Fair permalink fedilink source parent
[+] voracitude@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (10 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (9 children) That is assuming anyone still gives two hoots about your data by the time that lock can be cracked by anything that's not a supercomputer permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago* In a billion years I'm probably irrelevant. But is the data on my system right still relevant to anyone even in just 20 years time? I doubt it. No passwords or tokens will be valid anymore. Worst case they see some family photos or old browser history permalink fedilink source parent [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (6 children) Modern solutions for modern problems, ie, update as needed (and algorithms potentially invented) Alternatively hide it under the floorboards, with a nail over it and a hammer nearby as needed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children) I was by no means saying this is an 'after breach' scenario. Modern solutions don't save you retroactively, that wasn't the point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Sorry, I don't mean to say it's unnecessary in the event of a breach, you're absolutely correct there, I was just spitballing on the idea of encryptions without self-destruct buttons in majority non I-am-highly-targeted-by-CIA scenarios, how vigilant you'd have to be. With house warrants for instance, I was like "well, as the likelihood of them going being able to decrypt increases you should be on the look-out for alternative methods or harder encryption yeah" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Fair permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago (9 children) That is assuming anyone still gives two hoots about your data by the time that lock can be cracked by anything that's not a supercomputer permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago* In a billion years I'm probably irrelevant. But is the data on my system right still relevant to anyone even in just 20 years time? I doubt it. No passwords or tokens will be valid anymore. Worst case they see some family photos or old browser history permalink fedilink source parent [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (6 children) Modern solutions for modern problems, ie, update as needed (and algorithms potentially invented) Alternatively hide it under the floorboards, with a nail over it and a hammer nearby as needed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children) I was by no means saying this is an 'after breach' scenario. Modern solutions don't save you retroactively, that wasn't the point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Sorry, I don't mean to say it's unnecessary in the event of a breach, you're absolutely correct there, I was just spitballing on the idea of encryptions without self-destruct buttons in majority non I-am-highly-targeted-by-CIA scenarios, how vigilant you'd have to be. With house warrants for instance, I was like "well, as the likelihood of them going being able to decrypt increases you should be on the look-out for alternative methods or harder encryption yeah" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Fair permalink fedilink source parent
[+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago* In a billion years I'm probably irrelevant. But is the data on my system right still relevant to anyone even in just 20 years time? I doubt it. No passwords or tokens will be valid anymore. Worst case they see some family photos or old browser history permalink fedilink source parent [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (6 children) Modern solutions for modern problems, ie, update as needed (and algorithms potentially invented) Alternatively hide it under the floorboards, with a nail over it and a hammer nearby as needed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children) I was by no means saying this is an 'after breach' scenario. Modern solutions don't save you retroactively, that wasn't the point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Sorry, I don't mean to say it's unnecessary in the event of a breach, you're absolutely correct there, I was just spitballing on the idea of encryptions without self-destruct buttons in majority non I-am-highly-targeted-by-CIA scenarios, how vigilant you'd have to be. With house warrants for instance, I was like "well, as the likelihood of them going being able to decrypt increases you should be on the look-out for alternative methods or harder encryption yeah" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Fair permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 point 1 year ago* In a billion years I'm probably irrelevant. But is the data on my system right still relevant to anyone even in just 20 years time? I doubt it. No passwords or tokens will be valid anymore. Worst case they see some family photos or old browser history permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (6 children) Modern solutions for modern problems, ie, update as needed (and algorithms potentially invented) Alternatively hide it under the floorboards, with a nail over it and a hammer nearby as needed permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children) I was by no means saying this is an 'after breach' scenario. Modern solutions don't save you retroactively, that wasn't the point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Sorry, I don't mean to say it's unnecessary in the event of a breach, you're absolutely correct there, I was just spitballing on the idea of encryptions without self-destruct buttons in majority non I-am-highly-targeted-by-CIA scenarios, how vigilant you'd have to be. With house warrants for instance, I was like "well, as the likelihood of them going being able to decrypt increases you should be on the look-out for alternative methods or harder encryption yeah" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Fair permalink fedilink source parent
[+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children) I was by no means saying this is an 'after breach' scenario. Modern solutions don't save you retroactively, that wasn't the point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Sorry, I don't mean to say it's unnecessary in the event of a breach, you're absolutely correct there, I was just spitballing on the idea of encryptions without self-destruct buttons in majority non I-am-highly-targeted-by-CIA scenarios, how vigilant you'd have to be. With house warrants for instance, I was like "well, as the likelihood of them going being able to decrypt increases you should be on the look-out for alternative methods or harder encryption yeah" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Fair permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children) I was by no means saying this is an 'after breach' scenario. Modern solutions don't save you retroactively, that wasn't the point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Sorry, I don't mean to say it's unnecessary in the event of a breach, you're absolutely correct there, I was just spitballing on the idea of encryptions without self-destruct buttons in majority non I-am-highly-targeted-by-CIA scenarios, how vigilant you'd have to be. With house warrants for instance, I was like "well, as the likelihood of them going being able to decrypt increases you should be on the look-out for alternative methods or harder encryption yeah" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Fair permalink fedilink source parent
[+] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Sorry, I don't mean to say it's unnecessary in the event of a breach, you're absolutely correct there, I was just spitballing on the idea of encryptions without self-destruct buttons in majority non I-am-highly-targeted-by-CIA scenarios, how vigilant you'd have to be. With house warrants for instance, I was like "well, as the likelihood of them going being able to decrypt increases you should be on the look-out for alternative methods or harder encryption yeah" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Fair permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Sorry, I don't mean to say it's unnecessary in the event of a breach, you're absolutely correct there, I was just spitballing on the idea of encryptions without self-destruct buttons in majority non I-am-highly-targeted-by-CIA scenarios, how vigilant you'd have to be. With house warrants for instance, I was like "well, as the likelihood of them going being able to decrypt increases you should be on the look-out for alternative methods or harder encryption yeah" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Fair permalink fedilink source parent
[+] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Clairvoidance@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Fair permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bugfish@lemmy.bugfish.eu 1 point 1 year ago Thanks for linking :) Made a big upgrade a few days ago, I hope its useful. permalink fedilink source
all 13 comments