you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children)

    I was by no means saying this is an 'after breach' scenario. Modern solutions don't save you retroactively, that wasn't the point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Sorry, I don't mean to say it's unnecessary in the event of a breach, you're absolutely correct there, I was just spitballing on the idea of encryptions without self-destruct buttons in majority non I-am-highly-targeted-by-CIA scenarios, how vigilant you'd have to be. With house warrants for instance, I was like "well, as the likelihood of them going being able to decrypt increases you should be on the look-out for alternative methods or harder encryption yeah"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments