this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
69 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22081 readers
208 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A senior United Nations relief official said that Russia has so far declined requests to help residents of Russian-controlled areas of southern Ukraine impacted by the breach of the Kakhkova dam.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There goes the UN trying to interfere in Russia's genocide of innocent people again. No wonder conservatives and fascists hate the UN so much.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Everyone not hating UN is a very optimistic idiot in my eyes, no offense, but it just doesn't work.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think the UN "doesn't work" because you have absolutely no idea what it's supposed to do.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Its supposed to be a diplomatic forum but that is absolutely useless when you have a "security council" where each member can block everything. Furthermore letting countrys like Saudi Arabia take head of human rights council. Or all if the other shows of it being almost completely useless.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The UN isn't just the security council or the General Assembly, they do so much more, eg. ICAO is extremely relevant, just to name one organization. Again, you think the UN doesn't work because you don't know what they do. Parts of it don't work, lots do, same as any other huge transnational organization.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It was created to let governments talk to each other before resorting to nuclear war - a security council veto is a form of speech. Its been keeping that line of communication open, so its been working as intended. Anything else the organization might accomplish is just a bonus.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What is the realistic alternative?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

can they just stop being assholes for 5 minutes?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think for them to stop being assholes they'd need to feel the tiniest bit of empathy first and if the last year of relentless cruelty has shown us anything the Russian government has no empathy whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

::looks at Russian history:: Nope, not going to happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem isn't the Russian government; this brutality and callousness has been going on for hundreds of years. The problem is Russian culture that keeps producing these governments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe the Russian culture produced many such governments, but the current Russian government is still to blame for the current atrocities. I wouldn't blame the culture for those, since the culture has also produce people who were against that war, but were powerless against the dictatorship.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Saying "it's the government!" when it's a successive string of governments stretching back into times before there was a Russian empire is a bit of a cop out. Yes, the culture has produced many Russians who are against the war and having an authoritarian government, but that doesn't mean the wider cultural framework is in any way healthy or "good". A culture that produces constant imperialist wars should be criticized (and before someone chimes in with "but what about the USA!??!¿", I'm against their imperialist wars and large parts of their culture as well)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They’ve passed the war crime event horizon. In their view, why bother caring about it anymore?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wonder what it would take for UN peacekeepers to get involved. How bad does the situation need to get?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

UN peacekeepers famously did not get involved when the Serbs massacred Bosnian people in Srebrenica in their own "safe zones". I don't know if there are counter examples since then that demonstrate peacekeepers actually keeping peace, but that was the worst situation imaginable, and they still didn't get involved and just let it happen.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53346759

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You should familiarise yourself with the Rwandan Genocide for a good example of how useless they can be… I shudder just thinking about it…

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Cartoonishly evil.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Makes sense, it would be a major risk to accidentally shoot a UN representative, while you are shooting on people in need of aid. /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@0x815 once a clown, always a clown 🤡🤡🤡

load more comments
view more: next ›