An analysis of the emerging "Trump is at war with Iran" frame contextualizing three articles by Ken Klippenstein. It's my view that this frame is a mere attempt for Democrats to reframe themselves as war-adverse peaceniks against a background of Trump which they pretend is exceptional and unique. And to do this after their own brutal reign of genocide, without ever addressing the genocide.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

I must have missed the Ken Klippenstein's pro-Democrat arc where he said Democrats were peaceniks. Are you sure you are talking about Ken Klippenstrein?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Ken believes we're in an exceptional period of tension with Iran. His articles range from "we're already at war" to "war is on the table". I don't believe Ken thinks Democrats are peaceniks. I do believe this frame he puts forward is created and pushed by the DNC for very obvious reasons. It gives Democrats an ability to differentiate themselves from Trump on a moral issue that is of substantial weight with everyone. The wording I used is consistent with this, "mere attempt for Democrats to reframe themselves as war-adverse peaceniks against a background of Trump".

    If Trump really said/did these things,
    Then he must really want war with Iran.
    Ergo, Democrats are better.
    

    That's a DNC tactic to establish themselves as a moral authority. My problem is it only works when you ignore what they themselves say and do -- which is always very similar.

  • source
  • parent