top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 189 points 1 year ago (16 children)

I wonder who they will sell their data to

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Some future Musk backed AI eugenic human embryo generator.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    He's Looking for female incubators, of course they have to be white for him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Hasn’t he already had like a dozen “female incubators”?

    This guy can’t be bothered to wear a condom or pull out before he jizzes his vile seed into whatever human dna compatible life form chooses to allow his penis entry?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 141 points 1 year ago (25 children)

    How on Earth did they manage to fuck this up?

    They were the leading firm in a field where having the most data makes yours the most accurate tests. Their product sold for hundreds of dollars a pop, with practically zero marginal costs to run the tests. And they were really popular, selling like hotcakes.

    It's insane just how astoundingly incompetent upper management can be sometimes.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 102 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    They were being sued in the past for privacy breaches, they probably are in more trouble financially n than what's being reported?

    Apparently they were just there to sell your genome data once you submit it, also there's no repeat customers since once you get your results you aren't going to get another one.

    This article explains it better"https://www.standard.co.uk/news/science/23-and-me-dna-test-collapse-b1213426.html"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Good article. It was fundamentally not a good business model. You have to acquire new customers constantly just to keep the lights on, it’s unsustainable. Adding on top of that the expectations from investors to grow every year, and the collapse we see now is guatanteed.

    I see they tried to diversify, that could have helped, but without a recurring revenue stream at the core of your business, you cannot become the big company they wanted to be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    i was comparing it to THERANOS, more or less it was a scam from the start. Having someone like british pharm company glaxo-kline smith access to data without consent is just asking for trouble.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago*

    Yes, just terrible management. They could have just made good money, but no, there has to be more. So excessive greed at any price - now it's just bankruptcy. But I'm sure that won't bother the senior management: they've already put their millions in a safe place and will simply move on. The next company that needs their outstanding leadership is bound to come along...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    No returning customers, due to the nature of the business. It's dead from the start.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I don't. It's only happened to me once.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Right, but the data you get from that test is pretty broad. One test will create a background for an entire family. You only need to do one for one child. Or if both parents have one, or a sibling of both parents have done one, the children of that pair also no longer needs a test to see their background.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    It can't be just that, right? There are loads of successful products that any given person only ever buys once.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Come on. Any "buy it for life" product will fall in that category. Safety razor for example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Ah, you mean the original "razor and blades" business model that ensures repeat customers.

    (Yes, I'm aware that many people who use safety razors these days are not necessarily buying from brands that make both the razor and the blades, I am such a person myself, I'm somewhat joking on that)

    But even in the realm of "buy it for life" items, you can still end up with repeat customers. Maybe you want a second razor for your travel toiletry bag, or to keep in your second bathroom. Maybe you just see one that looks cooler, or the handle is more ergonomic, or the way you change the blade seems more convenient.

    And BIFL items still do sometimes get lost, stolen, given away, thrown out, or sometimes even broken and need to be replaced.

    And unless the world's population starts shrinking, there will always be new shavers hitting puberty who will eventually need their own razor.

    With a DNA test, unless you're questioning paternity or testing for specific genetic traits like cancer risk and such, once your parents have taken a test, you and your siblings don't really need to, you know what your parents are so you know what you are.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 101 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Reminder that you can download and save your data locally then revoke your consent agreements and delete your data. Who knows if it will actually be deleted though.

    Edit: Also revoke your consent to store your sample if you allowed that.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah good luck with that.

    I doubt they'd actually delete data now. Who are you going to sue if they don't? They're bankrupt and they'll just pull a "oh we forgot to delete it!"

    They need these samples and data to be sold off to pay off a lot of groups so I honestly don't believe they'll delete anything

    If your brother or even cousin did a test it's about good enough to be applied to you too for a lot of cases so yay, so much fun about human DNA databases now being available to the highest bidder.

    Who would bid? Maybe America's new Nazi's would like an insight in their racial purity? So many fun ideas!

    That company should be burned down to the ground

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago

    US people should get ready to be denied even more healthcare

  • source
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Well, I've always been curious what a ruthless person would do with all that DNA data. I'll finally find out.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Church of Latter Day Saints will probably buy it. They believe they can convert the dead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    They can’t possibly be that stupid. I’m sure they have more sinister plans for these geneology databases. My first guess would be blackmail. But I’m guessing they have a ton of other evil ideas.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • I am so glad i never used the kit my dad got me. I had a suspicion this would happen sooner or later

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›