all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 53 points 3 years ago* (12 children)

TLDR: dude applied for AdSense, adsense said he didn't have enough content, he used a large language model to generate content. And he got approved for AdSense cuz he had enough content

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 65 points 3 years ago* (3 children)

    I am the dude. Fair enough, but your summary misses the point. The original website was a useful tool that people use, but it didn't qualify for adsense. I draw an analogy to recipes. Recipe sites used to be useful, but now you have to scroll through tons of blogspam to even get to the recipe. Google has a monopoly on ads, and like it or not, ad revenue is how people who make websites get paid. Google's policies for what qualifies for AdSense have a huge impact on the internet.

    The point of the post is to show how direct that relationship is, using an existing and useful website.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Just wait. Some asshole Google employee will read his blog, and unapprove him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Rule one of generated content club is don't talk about generated content club. It's hard to prove somebody generated all the articles. But if they admit to it in an article you got them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 23 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    The point of the post is to talk about it because I care about the internet and don't want it to be filled with generated trash.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Honestly, good on you! I admire hat you are openly talking about this even tho you risk demonetization.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 6 points 3 years ago

    Don't be too impressed. So far I've only taken in a couple bucks.

    But seriously, that's why I do The Luddite. There are some good tech journalists and commentators, but they're usually professional journalists or opinion-havers. I code for a living. I think that perspective is often missing. How many people who write about the app store have actually submitted an app? Or like this post, how many have made and then monetized a website?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Given this trend, GPT 5 or 6 will be trained on a majority of content from its previous versions, modeling them instead of the expect full range of language. Researchers have already tested the outcome of a model-in-loop with pictures, it was not pretty.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 years ago

    Yeah absolutely. The Luddite had a guest write in and suggest that if anxiety is the self turned inwards,nthe internet is going to be full of increasingly anxious LLMs in a few years. I really liked that way of putting it.

  • source
  • parent