all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 26 points 2 years ago

Well, that's reassuring. Shitty hallucinating AI and atomic junk. What can go wrong...

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Total bullshit..just funneling money into OpenAI to keep it propped up with the least convincing cover story possible

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago*

    sam altman with pupils the size of plates prophesying agi killing us all

    well yes no shit sam if you give it to the nuke people im sure even an LLM can oneshot everyone

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    As CNBC reports, up to 15,000 scientists working at the institutions will get access to OpenAI's latest o1 series of AI models

    It's literally just a bunch of enterprise subscriptions. Big nothingburger, but can create these silly headlines that make it seem like OpenAI does anything at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    No thanks, I'd rather entrust the security of the end of civilization to floppy discs.

    https://archive.ph/s48V4

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    What is the benefit of this exactly?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    For the military, I'm sure this is a cost-cutting measure. I'm guessing they get to fire some people And make the rest of them work double time, but with AI assisting them.

    For the working people, it's another argument that you can point to to get people radicalized :D

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Not two hours ago, I was chatting with someone about the news conference talking about nuclear power, coal ("can't be destroyed!”) for AI, and said it was for TIA.

  • source