Ouch (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/memes@sopuli.xyz
 

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 52 points 3 years ago (23 children)

I fucking hate modern gaming

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Don't buy AAA games at release, and instead try out popular indie titles. They're usually a quarter of the price and some of them have become my favourite games of all time. Indie games have small teams of passionate devs who have total creative control.

    AAA games will typically release a "game of the year" edition a year or so after release with twice the amount of content the original game had for half the price.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 36 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    Nowadays buying games at release is doing yourself a disservice. You pay way more for way less than someone 6+ months later who gets it on sale with fixes already done

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    But then you'll miss out on the pre-order exclusives. How can you even play the game if you don't get that car with the special dickbutt livery? How will you defeat enemies if you don't get that special cabbage-shooting gun?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    This exception to this rule seems to be Nintendo titles but the caveat is that they’re on outdated hardware (and their own thing).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    The exception to the Nintendo rule is Scarlet and Violet. That game was extremely buggy and absolutely unpolished when it came out. Yet compared to other triple AAA titles of coming out around the same time, it looked like a game with almost no glitches whatsoever.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    There are hundreds of awesome games available. If all you're doing is buying the few AAA bug ridden and money grabbing games that come out each year you're doing yourself a huge disservice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    real (my passion for gaming has slowly atrophied from childhood as capitalism has taken hold, while passion for creating anything more than a busted cash-grab has long gone)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Plague of Unfinished Games: https://youtu.be/6PTnJ_iuVjQ?si=Dkecy5jeMBpN7FPm

    Talks about MVPs and how execs are disincentivising over-delivery and stuff.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago

    Gaming saying this as if they didn't buy a poorly optimised shooter in the mids 2000's for "benchmarking"

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    Not to be that guy but the Far Cry games seem pretty damn complete and bug free on release.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Because they are releasing the same game multiple times with just a splash of paint.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago* (4 children)

    I hate to defend Ubisoft, but this isn't fair at all.

    That "splash of paint" is the world design of entirely unique locations, a full story, a cast of characters, and new arsenals of weapons.

    As an amateur dev I have a bit of insight into this. I can, and have, made an entire FPS system in less than a day. A play that can move, weapons to shoot, and enemies that can target, follow and shoot at the player with the same weapon system. That part is not where the work is.

    It took two weeks to build on that foundation to barely make one small level. And I didn't even manage to fit in any story.

    The point is, those mechanics that to you are "the game" take infinitely less time to make than everything "the game" takes place in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I don't know. AC Valhalla doesn't have achievements on steam, so impossible to tell if I've 100% in it

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I can safely say that unless their design philosophy changes significantly I will never 100% an Ubisoft cookie cutter open world game because nothing they've produced is worth a hundred hours of boring repetitive gameplay.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    It's crazy because they have all the tools to make a successful game. Their AI NPCs are cutting edge, their environment models are so good that it was used to restore that one chapel that burnt down, etc. They just choose to make the same game every time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    So, is that what carpet-bombing with nukes looks like?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    Anno and Far Cry are usually in a very good state from the start. Assassin's creed isn't bad either. Unfinished games isn't that much of a ubisoft problem. There are much worse problems they have and other publishers have worse of the unfinished games problems.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I remember when I bought AC Unity on release it was in a sorry state. Littered with major bugs and the multiplayer was literally (and yes I do mean literally) unplayable for me. Probably the most broken game I've ever played on release!

    Generally though I agree, they're not the worst for bugs. Ubisoft have plenty of other issues with their games but that's a whole different discussion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›