108
submitted 1 year ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.world
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

Saving a click: the industry is “child surveillance“.

Yeah, it’s as creepy as it sounds.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

I’m not going against your point but telling an insane story. A friend of mine in California caught their nanny literally throwing and beating the crap out of their infant. When approach they ran back to their country. I’m sure there’s nothing they can do now. I would never even imagine this could happen!

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

I think that's Survivorship Bias, but I didn't read too closely after the 'litchally'.

[-] ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Survivorship bias about a friend’s child being beaten..? What?

[-] Krudler@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

Funny but I think your friend is a bit of a liar. Neat hey.

[-] ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s on the news with hundreds of videos recorded

https://abc7.com/post/exclusive-bay-area-parents-speak-after-2-day-old-baby-seen-camera-allegedly-abused-nanny/15588512/

Why would I make that up? This isn’t Reddit with karma

Edit: okay I see you just challenge everyone in your comments

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You find that story hard to believe?

[-] ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

It’s literally on the news… idk why I was doubted

[-] ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

Get normal IP cameras and problem solved.

[-] kalpol@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Still gotta block them at the firewall in case they are phoning home. Caught some of mine doing that

[-] ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah amcrest pings for config. They’re blocked

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

With an NVR most of them can run fully offline.

[-] koper@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago

It doesn't. Self-hosted open source surveillance is still surveillance. Constantly monitoring your children (above a certain age) is still helicopter parenting.

[-] ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

They’re months old, fuck off telling me that’s helicopter parenting. Don’t comment when you literally don’t know

[-] koper@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

That's obviously not what this article is about. Notice how I said "above a certain age"?

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If a slightly older person would migrate to GNU / Linux from a suggestion that it is more private. A young person, who underwent surveillance parenting, will most likely not give a damn.

Oddlyspecific

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Oddlyspecific

It's okay to leave the space in the middle.

[-] Ok_imagination@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Decent read. Some things I'll have to consider when my kids are old enough.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

"Apocalyptically terrible" - wow I wish they wouldn't soft-pedal it like that.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Off topic: the design of this site is very confusing. Each section with its heading and text body as a separate card, with the heading in the same color as links are. It makes it look like each card is a summary of a separate blog post or article. Also with the way the background image is static like that.

Need to rethink that design from a reading perspective.

this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
108 points (94.3% liked)

Privacy

9844 readers
63 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS