all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 31 points 2 years ago

the new policy brought that number down to a single device per year

  • source
  • [+] 31 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    They make nice looking devices, but I'd never trust a device from them.

    Of course, I don't trust a LOT of devices these days. Sure would be nice if we had a decent 5G capable, open source alternative. I don't care if it costs $800+. I'd buy it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Consider Sony Xperia 1 series then, they always have fully open policy regarding to unlocking and rooting with no deliberate restrictions whatsoever, took me less than a minute to root my Xperia 1 VI shortly after I got it. Also their very AOSP-like ROMs make modding much easier too.

    Also I bet you don't find many other flagship phones in 2024 that still have both SD card and headphone jack lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago*

    It was a big fat hassle already. With a waiting period of 7 days (168 h) enforced by their internet connected tools. Unlocking my Redmi Note 8 Pro was super annoying. I wouldn't do it anymore. Last time I bought a used Pixel instead. Similarly good value thanks to being used, and no proprietary bullshit.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Anything that requires manufacturer permission to unlock is untrustworthy.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Xiaomi stuff isn't worth buying, they don't really offer anything unique.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago*

    This is even worse then requiring a account (but atleast you don't need to agree to their privacy policy)

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Shame. They make some decent mid-range phones. Guess I'll have to look at Motorola now.

  • source