top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 266 points 2 years ago (51 children)
  • [–] 108 points 2 years ago (19 children)

    Careful, there are some edgy people out there who don’t want to use more than one browser because Firefox doesn’t work with their cameras /s

    Meanwhile, I’ll still be using Firefox too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 2 years ago (17 children)

    Who needs to give their browser access to their camera?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    May be bad phrasing, but Firefox doesn’t support h.265 so there’s limitations with streaming video on some camera platforms and other sites.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    TIL Firefox doesn't support HEVC. Hadn't really noticed that before, I guess it's why some Jellyfin streams started transcoding for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (31 replies)
    [–] 125 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    What could go wrong when you let an ad company dictate the browser standards/rules.

    I know we have Firefox and some forks like librewolf, but percentage wise it feels like a lost battle ( even if I am on Firefox ).

    If only people switched en masse to Firefox for the ad blocker. Wouldn't that be something... One big collective FU to Google.

    Oh well. One can dream I guess.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    The average Joe or Jane have no idea about ad blocking possibilities. They think ads are just the normal price you pay for surfing the web.

    I have even shown people the difference between their browsing experience and mine, and still they can't be arsed to install an ad-blocker.

    But then again, they use tiktok and Instagram and all the other brain-numbing shit out there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 99 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    We've known this was coming for a while now . . . but I suppose not everyone reads tech news.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 81 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    I used to recommend uBlock as a no-brainer, now folks really need to change towards a better browser.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    Or get network wide blocking. Doesn’t prevent everything but it does prevent most ads. Makes the internet tolerable at least.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    nah, lets get them switched away from chromium based spy machines.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Not everyone can. Work machines for instance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 63 points 2 years ago (44 children)

    And what? If someone can live with ads, they can stay. Otherwise anyone can install Firefox. I was all-in Google since the beginning of Gmail. And switching to Firefox was completely painless. Everything works the same, times of website incompatibility are long gone.

  • source
  • hideshow 44 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    Because Google is trying to turn the internet into a walled garden where only people with Chrome can visit the majority of websites.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    I've been been a full time Firefox user for three years now. Haven't experience a single problem like that. Haven't really experienced any problem at all to be honest

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Unfortunately that has not been the case for me. Some sites for buying concert tickets don't seem to like Firefox.

    I've had problems with several Microsoft sites we use internally for work ever since Edge went to Chrome.

    It's not Firefox's fault. Mozilla is abiding by web standards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (14 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    What if websites decide that chrome users earn much more ad revenue and start forcing users to switch with those "This website only supports Chrome" error messages? What if this practice gets popular? I'm sure there are ways to get around it, but the average users who bothered switching to Firefox at all, will just conclude that anything except chrome has a bad browsing experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    times of website incompatibility are long gone

    I wish I could agree with that. Hell, I have to use Chrome to download my phone bill from Virgin, and a couple of others don't work.

    And don't get me wrong, I'm not blaming FF. It's these lazy web developers that only target Chrome. I'm sure Safari users get the same shit experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 61 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Maybe we're thinking about this wrong. Maybe we should all start running plugins that just load whatever ads that show up in the background hundreds of times without showing them to us. Every viewer is thousands upon thousands of impressions and click through rates become absolutely miserable. We can make the ads worthless or maybe even make them cost a significant amount of money to host.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 51 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    I suspect this will soon be followed by a renewed effort by google to kill firefox compatability.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 42 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Didn't see this coming. Thanks for reporting it 😁

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    Looks like time to find a new browser!

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    May I interest you in browsers based on FireFox?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (10 children)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Hopefully wikipedia recognizes this as the official Canary in the Chrome mine. I was first impressed with chrome book because of seeing them used for education, getting my own laptop during school would've been mindblowing to kid me. I was unimpressed with the strangulation process of the OS but again shocked when they added a linux boot mode. There needs to be better alternatives by now, I would be ok with an OS developed by the department of education in conjunction with higher educational institutions. Could have a decent non-profit approach to a browser and ad blockers could legitimately be built in as a "protect the children" aim of approach.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Been using Firefox for quite a time now! What are the other alternatives?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    How many times has this been announced already?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I thought they already killed it? They keep killing it multiple times.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›