this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
845 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58698 readers
3943 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 265 points 1 week ago (31 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why not LibreWolf? It's Firefox without Mozilla's BS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Haven't heard of it before now

[–] [email protected] 108 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Careful, there are some edgy people out there who don’t want to use more than one browser because Firefox doesn’t work with their cameras /s

Meanwhile, I’ll still be using Firefox too

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Who needs to give their browser access to their camera?

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

May be bad phrasing, but Firefox doesn’t support h.265 so there’s limitations with streaming video on some camera platforms and other sites.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (4 children)

TIL Firefox doesn't support HEVC. Hadn't really noticed that before, I guess it's why some Jellyfin streams started transcoding for me.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago

It is supported in the nightly build and full support is in the works currently.

https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/ideas/hevc-support/idc-p/63424/highlight/true#M36557

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (5 children)

People who have to use their browser for telehealth and virtual teller banking access.

Sadly these are also things that require better security.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People who use Webex, zoom, etc for one use in try browser and don’t normally use those links. Happens at work when an outside vendor doesn’t use what we do.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] [email protected] 125 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What could go wrong when you let an ad company dictate the browser standards/rules.

I know we have Firefox and some forks like librewolf, but percentage wise it feels like a lost battle ( even if I am on Firefox ).

If only people switched en masse to Firefox for the ad blocker. Wouldn't that be something... One big collective FU to Google.

Oh well. One can dream I guess.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (9 children)

The average Joe or Jane have no idea about ad blocking possibilities. They think ads are just the normal price you pay for surfing the web.

I have even shown people the difference between their browsing experience and mine, and still they can't be arsed to install an ad-blocker.

But then again, they use tiktok and Instagram and all the other brain-numbing shit out there.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We've known this was coming for a while now . . . but I suppose not everyone reads tech news.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

one might say that this piece of news is the... canary... in the coal mine?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I used to recommend uBlock as a no-brainer, now folks really need to change towards a better browser.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Or get network wide blocking. Doesn’t prevent everything but it does prevent most ads. Makes the internet tolerable at least.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

nah, lets get them switched away from chromium based spy machines.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Not everyone can. Work machines for instance.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

sadly, agreed. mindshare leads to adoption, tho - so putting Firefox in front of more faces is always a positive. after all, its how google dominates.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 week ago (15 children)

And what? If someone can live with ads, they can stay. Otherwise anyone can install Firefox. I was all-in Google since the beginning of Gmail. And switching to Firefox was completely painless. Everything works the same, times of website incompatibility are long gone.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Because Google is trying to turn the internet into a walled garden where only people with Chrome can visit the majority of websites.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (15 children)

I've been been a full time Firefox user for three years now. Haven't experience a single problem like that. Haven't really experienced any problem at all to be honest

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unfortunately that has not been the case for me. Some sites for buying concert tickets don't seem to like Firefox.

I've had problems with several Microsoft sites we use internally for work ever since Edge went to Chrome.

It's not Firefox's fault. Mozilla is abiding by web standards.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

If you find any websites that don't work with firefox, you should report them to Mozilla. Firefox has a list of known bad websites, and has fixes for them, usually just a user agent override.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What if websites decide that chrome users earn much more ad revenue and start forcing users to switch with those "This website only supports Chrome" error messages? What if this practice gets popular? I'm sure there are ways to get around it, but the average users who bothered switching to Firefox at all, will just conclude that anything except chrome has a bad browsing experience.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Can't you have your Firefox browser just report itself as chrome?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe we're thinking about this wrong. Maybe we should all start running plugins that just load whatever ads that show up in the background hundreds of times without showing them to us. Every viewer is thousands upon thousands of impressions and click through rates become absolutely miserable. We can make the ads worthless or maybe even make them cost a significant amount of money to host.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AdNauseam does this to a lesser degree. I'm not sure how effective it is.

https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I suspect this will soon be followed by a renewed effort by google to kill firefox compatability.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't see this coming. Thanks for reporting it 😁

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It did its job then. Gave warning.

🐥⛏️

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Looks like time to find a new browser!

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

May I interest you in browsers based on FireFox?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (10 children)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hopefully wikipedia recognizes this as the official Canary in the Chrome mine. I was first impressed with chrome book because of seeing them used for education, getting my own laptop during school would've been mindblowing to kid me. I was unimpressed with the strangulation process of the OS but again shocked when they added a linux boot mode. There needs to be better alternatives by now, I would be ok with an OS developed by the department of education in conjunction with higher educational institutions. Could have a decent non-profit approach to a browser and ad blockers could legitimately be built in as a "protect the children" aim of approach.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Been using Firefox for quite a time now! What are the other alternatives?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How many times has this been announced already?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought they already killed it? They keep killing it multiple times.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›