all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I think there may be a physical aspect to this piece that is lost without the ability to move in relation to it, without shots from multiple angles, or a video.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I agree; I've noticed that with art like this a big part of the experience is being able to take in a lot of different angles and decide how to view it. I never thought Jackson Pollock paintings were interesting in photos, but when I got to see one in person the texture and depth from different angles made it a totally different experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I never really understand art like this. It's unique, and interesting, and fun to look at, but it's really not that special unless I'm missing something.

    It's just random shapes, and a unique set up. Like cutting the apples and fruit in certain ways.

    Just seems like a lot of work for something to look at for 3 seconds since there's nothing else to it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    What am I looking at. Coffee with foam?

  • source
  • The Pac Men rise!

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago