this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
63 points (66.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7319 readers
239 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago

Both sides support genocide and rascism. The only difference is aestheics and cultural signifiers

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Trump wants to build the wall and do genocide because be is racist.

Harris wants to build the wall and do genocide because it is good for the economy.

They are clearly not the same.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We are constantly making the mistake in Russia of judging the slogans and tactics of a certain party or group, of judging its general trend, by the intentions or motives that the group claims for itself. Such judgement is worthless. The road to hell—as was said long ago—is paved with good intentions.

It is not a matter of intentions, motives or words but of the objective situation, independent of them, that determines the fate and significance of slogans, of tactics or, in general, of the trend of a given party or group.

~ V.I Lenin Word And Deed

If both parties are doing the same shit, it doesn't fucking matter why

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (18 children)

On the left is racism AND genocide. But you knew that already, you're just happy to mislead.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (40 children)

Are you just going to ignore the racist and xenophobic talking points by Harris about how immigrants are bringing fentanyl to kill US citizens? Or Harris bringing up the factually incorrect claims about Hamas members and Palestinian men sexually assaulting Israelis, based on racist colonial tropes. Or how Harris was a top prosecutor that spent her entire career locking up minorities. I could go on and on, the entire debate consisted of the candidates trying to outdo each other with the amount of racism they were spewing.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

So you acknowledge Kamala is pro-genocide?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago

in the right is racism and genocide, but in way that's palatable to libs, you’re just happy to mislead

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago

The right is genocide AND rascism. But you knew that already, you're just happy to be self-decieved

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

Best line I've heard yet on the issue

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

How do you like your shit served?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Having a fringe lunatic as plausible opposition actually works really great in a two-party system, as the Democrats can really focus on policy for lobbyists and not so much on policy for the electorate. Just point out that the other guy would be worse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

It's even worse this time, Kamala is running to the right of Trump in 2016 regarding Immigrants, so you can see in real time Trump jump to go even further right, like the cats and dogs bit.

load more comments
view more: next ›