Both sides support genocide and rascism. The only difference is aestheics and cultural signifiers
post
Trump wants to build the wall and do genocide because be is racist.
Harris wants to build the wall and do genocide because it is good for the economy.
They are clearly not the same.
Are you just going to ignore the racist and xenophobic talking points by Harris about how immigrants are bringing fentanyl to kill US citizens? Or Harris bringing up the factually incorrect claims about Hamas members and Palestinian men sexually assaulting Israelis, based on racist colonial tropes. Or how Harris was a top prosecutor that spent her entire career locking up minorities. I could go on and on, the entire debate consisted of the candidates trying to outdo each other with the amount of racism they were spewing.
So you acknowledge Kamala is pro-genocide?
in the right is racism and genocide, but in way that's palatable to libs, you’re just happy to mislead
The right is genocide AND rascism. But you knew that already, you're just happy to be self-decieved
Having a fringe lunatic as plausible opposition actually works really great in a two-party system, as the Democrats can really focus on policy for lobbyists and not so much on policy for the electorate. Just point out that the other guy would be worse.
Which of these candidates do you think will be more willing to have their minds changed with protests and petitions?
Nothing is going to be easy or perfect, but we can at least choose the most likely candidate that is slightly more aligned with our desired outcome and then fight for what is needed.
Neither, American support for genocide has an economic basis and both candidates serve Capital.
Obviously neither, and anybody who claims otherwise is not engaging with reality.
The right one will be twice as willing as the left one!!
0*2 is 0, you see
0*2 is also 0 and maybe makes the joke better 🙃
top 50 comments