CEO Steve Huffman says tech giants should not be able to trawl Reddit’s huge store of data for free. But that information came from users, not the company

top 41 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 45 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (6 children)

i saw a spez quote, one of the sickest things i've ever read, about how people are sharing things on reddit, especially in mental health / recovery spaces, "that they wouldn't even share with a therapist", and isn't it a fucking travesty that that hasn't been properly harvested and monetized

this guy should be put in a fucking padded room


edit: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/18/technology/reddit-ai-openai-google.html

"There’s a lot of stuff on the site that you’d only ever say in therapy, or AA, or never at all … But we don’t need to give all of that value to some of the largest companies in the world for free."

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The more shit I hear come out of his mouth the more I’m disgusted that I ever used reddit. Aaron Swartz must be spinning in his grave

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago

    Unfortunately, I feel like Swartz would be spinning for a LOT of things that Web 2.0 turned out to be and propagate. We don't even blink at the idea of personal data being shared across unknown anonymous networks. It's a matter of "whatev's, they're welcome to find out what porn I like".

    Like remember when that Will Smith movie "Enemy of the State" came out and although it's way over the top, it was totally on point in principle on how vulnerable we are in networks overseen by anonymous government entities and private companies.

    Now we fucking applaud hundred-millionaires becoming billionaires for capitalizing on the internet stew we all threw our goods in for fun research, and internet community

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 3 years ago

    The greedy always forget their riches came from other people.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Oh you built this community through your own time moderating, posting, upvoting and commenting? Cool we're gonna sell it to Vanguard for a few billy and pocket the profits! And, here's a list of approved content you're allowed to post now. Hard pass bro nobody cares about your IPO when we built your company.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Spez is just trying to get that bag and run.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    So this is interesting, think of Google, Meta, Amazon, Apple. Their top goal is to use your user data to target you with ads and ultimately have you purchase a product or service. The better the return on ad spend the more advertisers spend on ads. It's actually a misconception that these companies directly sell user data, in fact it's in their best interest that they be the only one with your user data to give them an edge over their competitors in the ad business.

    Reddit, on the other hand, has openly admitted to wanting to sell user created content through their API. I get the sentiment I guess, AI is being trained off their site, so they should get paid right? But AI isn't being trained off Reddit's thought, creativity, or intelligence, that belongs to the users, all Reddit owns is the servers and the UI. Reddit is about to actually do what we've been scared of other tech companies doing this entire time.

    This honestly makes me more uncomfortable than targeted ads, because there's no circular dependency or even arguable benefit to the users here, it's one corporation taking your thought and selling it directly to another so they can both profit and build a tool that'll mostly be used by other corporations to automate and profit. It's all just another scam to get money out of our pockets.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago

    Monied interests have no morals

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Huffman claims it's about things like LLM training that uses the API, as if it isn't possible to validate apps that want to use the API and only issue keys for approved apps. This could save third party apps while preventing bad actors from gaining access to the data without scraping the site.

    No, if bad actors were the problem then the solution would be much different.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago

    DING DING DING! Finally, someone chimes in with the correct answer. Content on Reddit is created by the users. Users provide it for free, and Paint Hufferman exploits it for profit. Users get nothing in return, not even control over their own subreddits.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago* (4 children)

    So this is a real shitstorm – and one that, for a change, does not involve Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg.

    LOL! I know I should just let this go, but I do love watching a good dumpster fire!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    does not involve Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg

    RemindMe! 3 weeks

    (has anyone buillt a remindmebot for lemmy yet)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Ooh, there should be a Request A Bot community. Maybe there's peeps out there that just looove creating bots and know how to do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    I'm after a bot to post AFL games to the @afl magazine when new AFL games start. I tried making it myself, but i absolutely suck at programming. If anyone is interested please let me know :)

    FWIW, i just made @BotRequests if anyone is interested in joining.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Steve Huffman's a twat. Change my mind.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago

    reddit should be paying us

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago

    A shame the article doesn't mention alternatives such as kbin or lemmy

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago

    I know it's an opinion piece, but it's always kind of funny to see a word like "shitstorm" pop up in a credible news source.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    It was always so funny redditors saying things villanizing Meta, Apple or Amazon while thinking Reddit was so special

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Disagree. Those users gave it freely to Reddit under the user agreement with them, which in turn allows them to use it basically however they please, including sub licensing. No one gave other companies permission to do so.

    TLDR: read the things you agree to, next time

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago

    Yeah, you're probably right about the legal details of it. But what's written in legal texts doesn't necessarily align with what is morally acceptable. I interpret the article as an opinion piece about who has the moral high ground, and it certainly isn't Huffman. That guy has no moral compass.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›