all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 42 points 3 years ago*

The dev's explanation, in full, is:

The precompiled implementation is the only supported way to use the macros that are published in serde_derive.

If there is implementation work needed in some build tools to accommodate it, someone should feel free to do that work (as I have done for Buck and Bazel, which are tools I use and contribute significantly to) or publish your own fork of the source code under a different name.

Separately, regarding the commentary above about security, the best path forward would be for one of the people who cares about this to invest in a Cargo or crates.io RFC around first-class precompiled macros so that there is an approach that would suit your preferences; serde_derive would adopt that when available.

Not "Here's why I'm doing this, it might seem weird but there's a good reason" or anything. Just, go fuck yourself, run my binary.

I smell a similar resolution to the xfree86 -> xorg transition, where the community unanimously abandons serde in favor of the fork.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 15 points 3 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (3 children)

    Related how?

    Linked post title: What is going on with serde?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    If you read the linked post there you'll see that it's about devs discussing Serde's actions on the GH issue. How are they not related?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    They're related. I was merely adding context here, because the comment only said it is related, but not how. (Hence why I put the supposed question in italics.) The context I would have liked to immediately know if I want to follow the link or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment