top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 115 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That was a huge wall of text - TLDR :

  • Kagi has private investors
  • Kagi has had some questionable uses of the private funding, such as opening a t-shirt company
  • Kagi started as a AI focused company and pivoted to search
  • Kagi is spread too thin over many different projects
  • Kagi doesn't take privacy, or user data seriously

Fair enough, but as long as google, bing, ddg, etc get more and more unusable there will be fans of alternative searches

Even if Kagi crashes and burns, it has demonstrated there is a market demand for useful search results that users pay for directly.

FWIW I don't use Kagi because of the login / payment info requirements, so I agree broadly with the author. As bad as public searching is, its good enough to not give up privacy.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I've been really enjoying Qwant since I started using it after Mozilla announced their partnership.

    I am super annoyed when the "turn of ad blocker" popup shows itself. They'd get many more users by not using that and serving ads from the same domain as searches. I get that they have to pay for their services somehow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago

    the CEO sealioning after the author asked them not to contact them anymore is a bit icky, too.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I had no faith to lose. Its a search engine sign into. How could that be private.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Turns out Kagi does do advertising

    They promote their search engine but their users don't get to see ads. I don't know what's wrong about that. Every company advertises with its products. I don't see what's reprehensible about that.

    We did not say we maintain anonmity, but privacy, which are two different things. For example. your parents may know everything about you, yet still respect your privacy.

    They're right, anonymity and privacy are two different things. Since you have to pay to use Kagi, you're not anonymous. But they allegedly don't know what you as the user search for when using their search engine. So they're being honest here and how can honesty be bad here? Anyways, we're on privacy@lemmy.ml, not anonymity@lemmy.ml or whatever.

    “AI is mentioned zero times”

    While I still give you this one, they're technically correct. The word "AI" isn't there but they mention AI features, haha. It's a bit debatable since Vlad said "kagi.com" - which doesn't mention AI or AI tools. Only when you go to the pricing page there are mentions of AI tools.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago*

    I enjoyed reading the article. To me, the perspective of the owner reminds me of the owners of Brave in that they are Libertarian in ways that seem aligned with mainstream views at a glance but the Venn diagram also overlaps with a disdain for regulation, while portraying a (potential) facade of being eternally infallible and trustworthy while also being a for-profit company.

    Elon Musk also comes to mind in that his intelligence leaves him vulnerable to overlooking the nuances of conversations and alternative point of views. I think there's a general over reliance on artificial intelligence as a savior that will be fully embraced that will lead to large issues in the short/long term for Kagi.

    Personally, it always felt a little bit like astroturfing hearing all of the kagi fanboys in every privacy thread, but for what it's worth, seeing them show up live In the flesh in this thread as well makes me feel a bit less like I'm talking to bots lol

    Personally, I self-host my own version of searXng that only uses search engines that don't track my IP address. I'd say that those results are good enough 90% of the time, and when I need something more granular, I use a publicly hosted version of searXng that uses Google in its results

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    How can anyone worry about IP addresses when the search engine also knows your real world payment credentials? That and privacy don't really mix.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    They know the names of their customers but they don't know their search queries. There's the privacy. At least that's what they said. Since Kagi isn't Open Source it always comes down to trust.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So, this means Proton is not private either? Any product you pay for cannot be private?

    There is a difference between anonimity and privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    Wow, those unsolicited emails are icky

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Am I the only one thinking Lori comes across as a bit of a dick here?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah kind of, but the CEO needs to learn that not everyone will like their products, you cant convince everyone.

    The person said that they dont want to engage with the discussion, then the CEO should have just let it be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I am suspicious of anything I see being pushed as heavily as Kagi is pushed by it's alleged users.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I mean, that seems like a really sceptical way to live. Often things get shilled because people are just happy with the service and think the business is doing things well. I am a kagi user and have brought it up to some others, including outside of lemmy, because I find it produces better search results than ddg etc. And it's a definite step up from google in privacy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Well that sucks... that vlad dude is ehm... weird. I am happy with the service I am getting from Kagi, but such behaviour is not acceptable...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    TBH, OP sounds like a bit of an entitled douche, edit: not the most appropriate descriptor, but I do think OP should try and look at the situation from another perspective.

    In their blog post they complained about lack of transparency and noted numerous issues with Kagi that caused them to lose faith in the company. The CEO personally responds to explain themselves (i.e. make things more transparent) and OP sticks their fingers in their ears and acts liked they're a victim because the CEO attempts service recovery.

    I've made public complaints about companies before. I wish I received such tailored and personalised responses.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Did we read the same article? His responses to GDPR were very concerning, and I say that as an American.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I agree with you. I wasn't referring to the actual contents so much as OP's attitude about the e-mails from the CEO. I think Kagi could benefit from hiring, or at least consulting, with specialists in the field to better define their position. It's clear that OP has legitimate concerns.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I haven't seen many public diatribes against Kagi, but the ones I have seem to be like this person. They complain very publicly based on their perception of Vlad, spend their days in Discord fomenting drama (which seems like something only children should be doing) and are so fragile that they think getting measured emails from someone they went after publicly is a form of harrassment. It's absurd.

    I can only hope this was written by a teenager, otherwise it's a pretty rough way to live as an adult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    After reading your comment, my calling the OP an 'entitled douche' was not the best response. I remember the fragility of being a teenager, and even being a young adult... While unlikely, if the blog's author does come across these comments, I would rather they take a moment to consider things from Vlad's/Kagi's perspective rather than just take my comment as a personal attack.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You wish the CEO of a company would harass you?

    You wish a CEO would give general denials and the same non-answers you see in a comment thread while pretending to engage with you in good faith?

    Fuck off, the CEO gave no new info or perspectives and just showed himself to be the asshole that recent emerging evidence had been showing he was.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Jesus. How do you function if an email constitutes harassment?

    I get “harassed” daily by hundreds of spammers. I just don’t reply or give it another thought. Things OP could have done.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I spun up a docker container for searxng

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Successful CEOs need to learn to shut the fuck up.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Conflicted! Cory Doctorow just endorsed it & I’m way less smart than that person so i usually do what they say :\

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Seems like people making people mistakes. Not anything horrific.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›