624
Finally, an answer! (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/mst3k@lemmy.world
226 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

(I know this is about Rifftrax, but we don't have a Rifftrax community.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

Thanks. Comments above yours are a bit disingenuous, trying to bunch up intrusive lab techniques with selective breeding. While the definition of GMO is pretty vague, let's not pretend what Monsanto does is exactly the same as what Native Americans did.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    It's not. It's more advanced, and yes, it's better.

    You know, more technology becomes available, you use it to make life better for everyone. Monsanto execta can go pound dicks, but in principle, GMO food is perfectly fine, safe, and healthy. If anything, it'll be more healthy (more vitamins), more plentiful as new crops can withstand droughts better, etc. etc. etc.

    So far the only counter argument to that that I've heard here is "nuh uh!"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent