Uhhh, what the fuck?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 2 years ago* (7 children)

But nobody was doing that, in this case? There was no mention of 'giving grief'.

The husband voluntarily shared his location for practical reasons, a few times she happened to see he was stopped at a bar or a fast-food place instead of work where he claimed, and that was a weird phenomenon that impacted her trust in him. She realised she was getting too obsessed looking at his location. They later divorced for entirely unrelated reasons.

This isn't really that wacky.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    There was no mention of 'giving grief'.

    There was definitely the implication. She said he wouldn't admit to going to get fast food. That means she gave him grief over it, after catching him in the "lie"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments