102
I need a distro that can work right out the box without too much hassle to configure it, which one would you recommend? (lemm.ee)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
199 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Thx in advice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

I've used both, and the only third party repo I've enabled was tailscale. I've not had any issue with needing codecs in anything I've Installed through the discover app. I'll admit that I don't have an Nvidia card, so I don't know how good support is ootb there (though iirc, at least openSUSE has a separate installer that include Nvidia drivers)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    You likely have and not noticed. Hardware rendering even with the Intel iGPU requires them. Just means things are not as performant or efficient as they could be, and more power usage, as your cpu is doing the rendering instead.

    For example: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox_Hardware_acceleration#Configure_VA-API_Video_decoding_on_AMD (this references Firefox but applies to most video players)

    The patents have routinely caused headaches. For years (2017) neither one could play mp3s and only recently have they gotten support for proper subpixel rendering. The mp3 (and dvd) thing was a big reason people used Ubuntu instead for a long time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    Sure, but in both cases it installs the flatpak version that distributes the codecs with the runtime.

    Although, now that I say this, I did install the flathub repo on fedora, which does slightly undermine my point

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent