you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Tom bombadil and the scouring of the shire were just, logical omissions.

What they did to my boy Gimli though.. :'(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    I disagree, I think the scouring of the shire is important and adheres to the themes established like home being worth fighting for even if you're small and weak.

    I just really like Bombadil, so I accept that I'm biased.

    Gimli definitely got shafted.

    Boromir... I have never seen such a crime committed against a character before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I like bombadil too! I just have hard time imagining the scene working in the film.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    How different was Gimli in the books? I must admit I didn't read them, but in my defense I don't read any books.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    Book gimli is an intelligent, articulate warrior poet.
    Film gimli is a bumbling comedic relief.

    For example when they enter Moria, in the film, most of the exposition in the film is given to Gandalf, with Gimli being reduced to gasping and awing.

    "These are not holes," said Gimli. "This is the great realm and city of the Dwarrowdelf. And of old it was not darksome, but full of light and splendour, as is still remembered in our songs."

    He rose and standing in the dark he began to chant in a deep voice, while the echoes ran away into the roof.

    Followed by Gimli singing a song about its former splendour

    At the tomb of Balin, instead of crying and moaning the whole scene:

    "He is dead then," said Frodo. "I feared it was so." Gimli cast his hood over his face.

  • source
  • parent