973
thank you Linux for giving a damn about Bluetooth headphones (feddit.de)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
200 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

For context, LDAC is one of the few wireless audio codecs stamped Hi-Res by the Japan Audio Society and its encoder is open source since Android 8, so you can see just how long Windows is sleeping on this. I'm excited about the incoming next gen called LC3plus, my next pair is definitely gonna have that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 years ago (3 children)

I have a Radsone ES100 Bluetooth DAC/headphone amp, and that supports LDAC, multipoint, and doesn't compromise the LDAC bitrate when you have multipoint enabled. You can even leave it plugged in as a USB DAC and still use multipoint BT with LDAC, and it switches smoothly between the sources depending on which device started playing a stream most recently.

I was distinctly underwhelmed by the BT implementation when I got my Sony XM4s, it's kinda weak by comparison.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    Nice one!

    I am distinctly underwhelmed in general by the XM4.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    Yeah, I agree.

    I bought them for their noise cancelling primarily, and they're excellent at that, but otherwise they're not great. The un-EQed frequency response is terrible for headphones in their price range: flabby, wildly over-exaggerated bass and no mids at all. Running without EQ I can barely hear lyrics - every singer sounds like they're mumbling underwater. I've had $20 IEMs with better tonal balance. They respond well to EQ but the on-board EQ doesn't have enough frequency bands to even come close to fixing them. Wavelet on Android doing EQ duty makes them listenable. Even when you do EQ them properly, they still sound a bit dull and lifeless.

    No idea how they got so much praise when they were launched. The power of marketing budgets I guess. For a while I was gaslighting myself thinking I had a faulty pair or maybe there was something going wrong with my hearing, but having heard another pair, and doing comparisons with my other headphones - most of which are far cheaper - I realised that no, they're just not very good as headphones.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    I agree wholeheartedly and would add 'borderline unusable for voice calls' to the XM4's sins, which is admittedly an improvement over 'entirely unusable for voice calls' ala XM3/XM2/1000X. Spent quite a while trying to get the XM4 to sound 'good', and they just won't.

    The 1000X series has reached a level of critical mass otherwise only touched by AirPods in consumer headphoneland - people have heard of them, and want them, and read reviews which say 'best for most people', and their friends recommend them, and they want them more. And they buy them, and 5 stars A+++ these are the best headphones they've ever heard. Which is their truth. Meets the expectations of most, and exceeds for those who haven't experienced top-tier ANC before.

    Credit where it is due, Sony managed to make a product with a traditional Japanese letter-letter-number-number model, and made it famous enough to ask for by name. It is the consistency in product and marketing plus the halo effect that's seen 1000X series reach critical mass. Reviews saying 'actually I don't like how these sound and struggle to get them sounding much better with the rubbish in-app EQ that doesn't have a slider corresponding to the ~200Hz spike' aren't common.

    We live in a world where AirPods and Spotify are good enough for most people. I'm just glad there's room in the market for well-tuned over-ear ANC cans too.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent