Asklemmy

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

55,570 readers

3,686 active

839 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~~Icon~~ by ~~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~~

founded 7 years ago

moderators

Automobiles replacing horses: ethical consequences (reddthat.com)

submitted 2 years ago by cqthca@reddthat.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Did automobiles replacing horses, diminishing horse population, diminishing horse suffering -- as a consequence of work forced upon the animals. Is that moral win for horses; less suffering? Although their population is vastly smaller than 130 years ago.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

You should have expected that of course. No one can talk to a horse.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] cqthca@reddthat.com [S] 1 point 2 years ago

only donkeys can articulate complaints to their owners. it is in the bible, which has to be true or civilization would be pointless. /s

permalink

fedilink

source

parent