43
Automobiles replacing horses: ethical consequences (reddthat.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Did automobiles replacing horses, diminishing horse population, diminishing horse suffering -- as a consequence of work forced upon the animals. Is that moral win for horses; less suffering? Although their population is vastly smaller than 130 years ago.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

it’s better to not even exist in the first place than to suffer. This goes for farm animals as well but we’re not

If you believe this, does that give you a moral imperative to start a nuclear war and end the suffering of future human generations?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •