you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 66 points 2 years ago (125 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Yes. Also blame the members of the security council for preventing the UN being effective in solving global conflicts. Ideally, NATO wouldn't be necessary

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Disagree. UN is a diplomacy tool, NATO is a defense organization. Entirely different goals, and if UN was a defense organization something else would have filled the void for diplomacy and you’d say UN wouldn’t be necessary.

    You don’t play diplomacy with your friends. And you cannot get your enemies to sit down if you’re aiming a gun at them. The UN not having teeth is the point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (113 replies)