you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 2 years ago (7 children)

What many of us imagine is that it's bad when either nation does this.

Yes, it is hypocritical for most US politicians to criticize Russia's interference in US elections, but it's not incorrect.

It certainly isn't wrongthink for those of us who have little influence on what alphabet agencies do to complain about it happening just because it's happening elsewhere, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    That's a non sequitur at best.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Another non sequitur, and in any case not what I said (nor implied, unless you read my reply in bad faith).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Thank you for explaining what your point was, but it's absolutely a non sequitur. My original point was about the validity of criticizing something because it's happening by more than one bad actor. Not quibbling about whether an small part of my statement ("little influence") is 100% correct or not. My point wasn't about litigating whether or not the US is a democracy, so: it was a non sequitur.

    That said, it's clearly a waste of time to engage with you, because if you're going to be bent out of shape for being "accused" of a non sequitur and then start calling me "a schlub that lives in a fascist empire", then you don't have the temperament to actually fight a fascist empire. Some of us do more than vote and complain online.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment