you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    WTF are you even talking about? You keep using super vague phrases to try and argue that (and I'm just guessing here since I legitimately can't tell what you are trying to say) LGBTQ advocates are ignoring history?

    What history are you pointing to? Why would that history matter in fields like medical science? Would the history of gender help us understand that some people identify as trans? Would it help us understand the best practices in helping them?

    Was this all just a way to complain about "men" going into women's spaces?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    is that not exactly what scientists, philosophers, artists, politicians, lawyers, psychologists, doctors and similar have been doing for thousands of years though?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I don't know if you're aware of this but this is like the epitome of "iamverysmart" style speech. You might think that your way of speaking is so advanced that everyone else not understanding it is just dumber than you, but the reality is proper communication is about making communication as clear and concise as possible to as wide an audience as possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Frankly I already “dumbed it down” quite considerably

    r/iamverysmart in a nutshell here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments