▲ 335 ▼ Please don't use Discord for FOSS projects (drewdevault.com) submitted 2 years ago by starman@programming.dev to c/foss@beehaw.org 31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 49 points 2 years ago (2 children) I feel like cross-posts should share comment threads… Now comment threads are split across 6 communities. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 16 points 2 years ago (2 children) Kbin website implements this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Oh really? That's interesting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, to be precise, kbin groups posts with the same URL. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago I've seen some Lemmy apps/interfaces do that as well. So maybe it's not all that different? I think what they're suggesting is that a post would have a merged view of all comments from all the different duplicate posts in all the different communities it's posted in. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0421008445828ceb46f496700a5fa6@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I see the cross posts all at the top but comments are separate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago To combine the comments would probably require a revision to the lemmy protocol, plus an even bigger one to the backend software to keep backwards compatibility permalink fedilink source parent [–] noddy@beehaw.org 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) If it is possible to detect which posts are cross posts, it should be possible to create a client app that combines the threads. Maybe give you an option to chose which one to post your comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kissaki@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don't think it should be a client feature. It should be federated, like the posts are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 2 years ago* I think the issue with federation of comments is moderation of comments. You might not like the admins of example.org:foo but you might have no issues with the admins of example.com:foo. permalink fedilink source parent [–] noddy@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago I was just thinking about a possible solution based on what we have. I agree it would be better if cross post comments were federated, but I guess there's different opinions on that (do the lemmy devs agree for example?). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 16 points 2 years ago (2 children) Kbin website implements this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Oh really? That's interesting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, to be precise, kbin groups posts with the same URL. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago I've seen some Lemmy apps/interfaces do that as well. So maybe it's not all that different? I think what they're suggesting is that a post would have a merged view of all comments from all the different duplicate posts in all the different communities it's posted in. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0421008445828ceb46f496700a5fa6@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I see the cross posts all at the top but comments are separate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago To combine the comments would probably require a revision to the lemmy protocol, plus an even bigger one to the backend software to keep backwards compatibility permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Oh really? That's interesting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, to be precise, kbin groups posts with the same URL. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago I've seen some Lemmy apps/interfaces do that as well. So maybe it's not all that different? I think what they're suggesting is that a post would have a merged view of all comments from all the different duplicate posts in all the different communities it's posted in. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, to be precise, kbin groups posts with the same URL. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago I've seen some Lemmy apps/interfaces do that as well. So maybe it's not all that different? I think what they're suggesting is that a post would have a merged view of all comments from all the different duplicate posts in all the different communities it's posted in. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago I've seen some Lemmy apps/interfaces do that as well. So maybe it's not all that different? I think what they're suggesting is that a post would have a merged view of all comments from all the different duplicate posts in all the different communities it's posted in. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0421008445828ceb46f496700a5fa6@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I see the cross posts all at the top but comments are separate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago To combine the comments would probably require a revision to the lemmy protocol, plus an even bigger one to the backend software to keep backwards compatibility permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago To combine the comments would probably require a revision to the lemmy protocol, plus an even bigger one to the backend software to keep backwards compatibility permalink fedilink source parent
[–] noddy@beehaw.org 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) If it is possible to detect which posts are cross posts, it should be possible to create a client app that combines the threads. Maybe give you an option to chose which one to post your comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kissaki@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don't think it should be a client feature. It should be federated, like the posts are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 2 years ago* I think the issue with federation of comments is moderation of comments. You might not like the admins of example.org:foo but you might have no issues with the admins of example.com:foo. permalink fedilink source parent [–] noddy@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago I was just thinking about a possible solution based on what we have. I agree it would be better if cross post comments were federated, but I guess there's different opinions on that (do the lemmy devs agree for example?). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don't think it should be a client feature. It should be federated, like the posts are. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 2 years ago* I think the issue with federation of comments is moderation of comments. You might not like the admins of example.org:foo but you might have no issues with the admins of example.com:foo. permalink fedilink source parent [–] noddy@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago I was just thinking about a possible solution based on what we have. I agree it would be better if cross post comments were federated, but I guess there's different opinions on that (do the lemmy devs agree for example?). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 2 years ago* I think the issue with federation of comments is moderation of comments. You might not like the admins of example.org:foo but you might have no issues with the admins of example.com:foo. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] noddy@beehaw.org 1 point 2 years ago I was just thinking about a possible solution based on what we have. I agree it would be better if cross post comments were federated, but I guess there's different opinions on that (do the lemmy devs agree for example?). permalink fedilink source parent