this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024

853 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

technology@lemmy.world

88,074 readers

15,332 active

3,516 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderators

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

The HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementation (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 2 years ago by smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@lemmy.world

153 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

It's usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] zarenki@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

The passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.

parent