▲ 853 ▼ The HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementation (www.gamingonlinux.com) submitted 2 years ago by smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@lemmy.world 153 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works 55 points 2 years ago (3 children) Hard to find on non-pc gear, but that’s a fair point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zarenki@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago The passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago can't you just mod it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zarenki@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago The passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zarenki@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago The passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago can't you just mod it? permalink fedilink source parent