▲ 2502 ▼ Advertising revenue in Twitter crashes by 50% (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by ghariksforge@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 425 comments fedilink hide all child comments nuff said
[+] traveler01@lemmy.world 19 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (7 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] AChiTenshi@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 years ago (4 children) Perhaps. But a rather large issue arises when your content is generated primarily by users who wouldn't want to pay for a service. There is also the issue where if you are having to pay to get around interaction limits is it really free speech? Or just limited to those that can afford to pay? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] traveler01@lemmy.world -5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Techmaster@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago (2 children) Imagine using Twitter to train AI. "Why is my AI such an asshole!?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 2 points 3 years ago I'd argue it's a poisoned dataset. You can't validly train an AI based on content that contains a non-trivial percentage of bot-generated content. permalink fedilink source parent [+] traveler01@lemmy.world -3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) He doesn't really care about free speech. Just his opinions. (He is shadowbanning Ukrainian accounts btw) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] traveler01@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AChiTenshi@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 years ago (4 children) Perhaps. But a rather large issue arises when your content is generated primarily by users who wouldn't want to pay for a service. There is also the issue where if you are having to pay to get around interaction limits is it really free speech? Or just limited to those that can afford to pay? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] traveler01@lemmy.world -5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Techmaster@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago (2 children) Imagine using Twitter to train AI. "Why is my AI such an asshole!?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 2 points 3 years ago I'd argue it's a poisoned dataset. You can't validly train an AI based on content that contains a non-trivial percentage of bot-generated content. permalink fedilink source parent [+] traveler01@lemmy.world -3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] traveler01@lemmy.world -5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Techmaster@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago (2 children) Imagine using Twitter to train AI. "Why is my AI such an asshole!?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 2 points 3 years ago I'd argue it's a poisoned dataset. You can't validly train an AI based on content that contains a non-trivial percentage of bot-generated content. permalink fedilink source parent [+] traveler01@lemmy.world -3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Techmaster@lemmy.world 25 points 3 years ago (2 children) Imagine using Twitter to train AI. "Why is my AI such an asshole!?" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 2 points 3 years ago I'd argue it's a poisoned dataset. You can't validly train an AI based on content that contains a non-trivial percentage of bot-generated content. permalink fedilink source parent [+] traveler01@lemmy.world -3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 2 points 3 years ago I'd argue it's a poisoned dataset. You can't validly train an AI based on content that contains a non-trivial percentage of bot-generated content. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] traveler01@lemmy.world -3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) He doesn't really care about free speech. Just his opinions. (He is shadowbanning Ukrainian accounts btw) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] traveler01@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] traveler01@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
