▲ 1745 ▼ Hollywood Shuts Down After 160,000 Actors Walk Off the Set (youtu.be) submitted 3 years ago by Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world 428 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 3 years ago (1 child) I saw a great strike sign- "I refuse to memorize lines written by a machine." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) But why? I feel like people are twisting their arguments against AI. Or they are being twisted against. Why does an actor care where there lines come from? We live in a world where The Room was written and released, but AI content is going to be the end of media? People aren't that special. Our thoights aren't that special. We don't have souls. We're just thinking machines, and nothing we create is more unique than something that we created creates. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 years ago But why? ... Because this is about enshitification of life for studio exec profits. It's not really about where a machine can or should be a part of creative works, but HOW they are being used. Nearly very industry in which LLMs are being used in the latest hype wave, it's not being used to improve anything but concentration of wealth in the hands of a dwindling number of individuals by worsening product quality and real ability of any of humanity, outside of those of hereditary wealth, to be get by. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) But why? I feel like people are twisting their arguments against AI. Or they are being twisted against. Why does an actor care where there lines come from? We live in a world where The Room was written and released, but AI content is going to be the end of media? People aren't that special. Our thoights aren't that special. We don't have souls. We're just thinking machines, and nothing we create is more unique than something that we created creates. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 years ago But why? ... Because this is about enshitification of life for studio exec profits. It's not really about where a machine can or should be a part of creative works, but HOW they are being used. Nearly very industry in which LLMs are being used in the latest hype wave, it's not being used to improve anything but concentration of wealth in the hands of a dwindling number of individuals by worsening product quality and real ability of any of humanity, outside of those of hereditary wealth, to be get by. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 years ago But why? ... Because this is about enshitification of life for studio exec profits. It's not really about where a machine can or should be a part of creative works, but HOW they are being used. Nearly very industry in which LLMs are being used in the latest hype wave, it's not being used to improve anything but concentration of wealth in the hands of a dwindling number of individuals by worsening product quality and real ability of any of humanity, outside of those of hereditary wealth, to be get by. permalink fedilink source parent