this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024

745 points (95.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

13,313 readers

810 active

33 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

to raise awareness around the dangers, inefficiencies and injustice that can come from car dependence.
to allow a place to discuss and promote more healthy transport methods and ways of living.

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.
No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.
Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.
No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.
No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.
No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.
No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 5 years ago

moderators

uthredii@lemmy.ml

uthredii@beehaw.org

What can you get to within a 15-minute walk of your house? (mediacdn.aus.social)

submitted 2 years ago by ajsadauskas@aus.social to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

567 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What can you get to within a 15-minute walk of your house?

A recent YouGov survey asked Americans what they think they should be able to get to within a 15-minute walk of their house.

Of these choices, I can currently walk to all of them from my apartment, aside from a university (no biggie, I'm not currently studying, although there is a Tafe within walking distance), a hospital, and a sports arena.

How many can you get to with a 15 minute walk from your house?

#fuckcars #walkability #urbanism #UrbanPlanning @fuck_cars #walking

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 50 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I wonder what the meaning of “should not” is in this survey. A restaurant “should not” be withing 15 minutes of my home, as in “I don’t want any restaurants near me” or is it “It’s not important enough to be in the local government’s target list”?

I don’t understand the red bars the way the question is phrased now. Why wouldn’t you want a park near you?

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 2 years ago (1 child)

If they used the phrase “15 minute neighborhood” during polling then a portion of the no’s are probably from people who have had it turned into a trigger word for them by conservative talk media.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 25 points 2 years ago

Yeah that's what I'm assuming the 16% who don't even want a grocery store near them is. That sets your baseline.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 10 points 2 years ago

"If your local government did adopt..."

I bet 16% don't want "the government" to anything.

That said, people in my neighborhood are strongly against sidewalks. Something about bringing the problems of the big city to us. (I presume crime, but it could be anything.)

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago

“It’s not important enough to be in the local government’s target list”

I think this is the correct interpretation given the exact wording of the question.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4