you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 80 points 2 years ago (8 children)

The only thing the Western media portrayed him as was as an opponent of Putin. His nationalist tendencies were unknown to Western libs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    As so was his irrelevancy in the general landscape of Russian politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Never fails to take me out when I hear know-nothing burgers talking about "if there were an election he'd have beat putler 2:1" and I'm just fighting the urge to start smirking like "oh, so the same margins that clinton was supposed to beat trump by right?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Libs framed him as a russian MLK 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    In the minds of western libs, nations in what the west calls "the jungle" doesn't have a fully-fledged political system with differing ideologies and interests based in material conditions. Instead they just have a simple pro-democracy/pro-western Vs. pro-BadCountry/authoritarian divide.

  • source
  • parent