you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 2 years ago (9 children)

admittedly if i signed up to learn about historical literature and instead of reading the books themselves i had to read about the books and about communist pirates i would feel a little lied to

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    The novel is a pretty recent Western invention

    Not true. Chinese were printing 1000+ page novels when Euros still thought putting up few rhymes is height of literature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    I don't think that's fair either since the Satyricon and Apuleius' Golden Ass are also much older. There were also a bunch of novels written in the medieval period that eventually evolved into the modern through things like Gargantua and Don Quixote, which is what I think ends up confusing people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    oh i know, but you expect to be mostly reading stories when you sign up for a class like that, maybe spend a week on some other stuff but mostly novels or short stories

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Huh, at university level I would expect mostly articles and discussion about the literature, you'd be reading the literature in your own time (if you wanted, they'd give you excerpts for the tutorials if necessary). I imagine sitting around a table while a grad student tries to coax answers about why this historian's interpretation of Chaucer is good or bad.

    Idk about the communist pirates though, personally I think lectures are bad and classes should be small enough to adopt a more conversational tone.

  • source
  • parent