▲ 884 ▼ Wi-Fi jamming to knock out cameras suspected in nine Minnesota burglaries -- smart security systems vulnerable as tech becomes cheaper and easier to acquire (www.tomshardware.com) submitted 2 years ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world 238 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 52 points 2 years ago (7 children) oh, sweet, sweet ethernet. how I love you. permalink fedilink source hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago (6 children) As long as it's not 100mbps ethernet on unshielded cable, that's the absolute worst for RFI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] gregorum@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) then don’t do that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as it’s not two children with cups attached to a shoestring, that’s the absolute worst. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers permalink fedilink source parent [–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Sure, but still harder to do than wifi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) The issue with 100mbps ethernet is than it interferes with HF and VHF radio. It would certainly be possible for radio to interfere with ethernet, but I've never knocked mine out even with 100 watts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Sure, but the topic is “rf interference of your camera feeds” You CAN interfere with Ethernet, but it’s much harder to do, as evidenced by your 100 watts permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago (6 children) As long as it's not 100mbps ethernet on unshielded cable, that's the absolute worst for RFI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] gregorum@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) then don’t do that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as it’s not two children with cups attached to a shoestring, that’s the absolute worst. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers permalink fedilink source parent [–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Sure, but still harder to do than wifi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) The issue with 100mbps ethernet is than it interferes with HF and VHF radio. It would certainly be possible for radio to interfere with ethernet, but I've never knocked mine out even with 100 watts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Sure, but the topic is “rf interference of your camera feeds” You CAN interfere with Ethernet, but it’s much harder to do, as evidenced by your 100 watts permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) then don’t do that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as it’s not two children with cups attached to a shoestring, that’s the absolute worst. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) As long as it’s not two children with cups attached to a shoestring, that’s the absolute worst. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Sure, but still harder to do than wifi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) The issue with 100mbps ethernet is than it interferes with HF and VHF radio. It would certainly be possible for radio to interfere with ethernet, but I've never knocked mine out even with 100 watts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Sure, but the topic is “rf interference of your camera feeds” You CAN interfere with Ethernet, but it’s much harder to do, as evidenced by your 100 watts permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) The issue with 100mbps ethernet is than it interferes with HF and VHF radio. It would certainly be possible for radio to interfere with ethernet, but I've never knocked mine out even with 100 watts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Sure, but the topic is “rf interference of your camera feeds” You CAN interfere with Ethernet, but it’s much harder to do, as evidenced by your 100 watts permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Sure, but the topic is “rf interference of your camera feeds” You CAN interfere with Ethernet, but it’s much harder to do, as evidenced by your 100 watts permalink fedilink source parent