Shrike502 comments on NYT is now openly talking about a peace deal in which Ukraine would have to remain neutral and give up territory

NYT is now openly talking about a peace deal in which Ukraine would have to remain neutral and give up territory (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 2 years ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/ukraine_war_news@lemmygrad.ml

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Tbf I suspect their definition of "neutral" is different from yours or mine. Sweden was "neutral". Finland was "neutral". Switzerland, Austria, many of the offshores, I'm sure. What did it mean in practice? Diddly squat.

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] lorty@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Considering how the ukrainian regime wiped their ass off with previous deals, I'm not sure Russia is willing to believe in a "neutral ukraine".

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 years ago

Certainly not to give Ukraine the time to restock and start again.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent