Seems to me the fear of overloading one instance over another will not happen after all.

But I do hope the Threadiverse can hit 500,000 consistent active users by the end of summer.

Give me that hopium guys! 💉

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Think that's more or less correct, but regarding @drturtle@lemmy.world's question about overloading, I think that it may affect folks even on other instances if Lemmy.world's overloading affects its response time to other servers attempting to sync with it.

E.g. Lemmy.world is bogged down -> Lemm.ee tries to sync posts/comments from .world -> .world takes a longer time to fulfill the request -> Lemm.ee sees older posts/comments for awhile until .world catches up to requests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Glad to hear I'm not totally off the mark. I wonder then if instance-to-instance transactions would cause less overall congestion than local user traffic in such cases.

    For example, if there are 25,000 users spread across 5 instances (with some overlap in community participation), would the instance-to-instance transactions needed to facilitate these users result in less of a performance hit than having all 25,000 users on the same instance? I don't know nearly enough about databases to make an educated guess.

  • source
  • parent