▲ 29 ▼ Has anyone tried booster to replace mkinitcpio? (lemmy.ml) submitted 2 years ago by Certainity45@lemmy.ml to c/archlinux@lemmy.ml 15 comments fedilink hide all child comments https://github.com/anatol/booster Does this give any real world value for boot times or anything else? I have no possibility to test this in VM so that's why I'm asking if anybody has actually tried this and found benefits.
[–] ar0177417@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I have tried dracut but not booster. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Certainity45@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) How was it? Where exactly you saw difference? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ar0177417@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago There might be some speed improvement (not that noticeable). But I can control the modules more freely than mkinitcpio, so I like it more. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Certainity45@lemmy.ml [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) How was it? Where exactly you saw difference? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ar0177417@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago There might be some speed improvement (not that noticeable). But I can control the modules more freely than mkinitcpio, so I like it more. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ar0177417@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago There might be some speed improvement (not that noticeable). But I can control the modules more freely than mkinitcpio, so I like it more. permalink fedilink source parent