you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

Much less likely than a male though. Just look at the numbers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Absolutely. This just means less resources are required, not no resources at all.

    Would you argue for stopping funding for reasearching and combatting rare diseases affecting only a small population? If you were to base funding solely on utilitarianism, you would.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment