▲ 45 ▼ This spammer created multiple accounts on various Lemmy instances to post self advertisements. How do we combat this? (media.kbin.social) submitted 3 years ago by Cloudless@kbin.social to c/fediverse@kbin.social 67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) We have a login, that's all the requirement. We have adopted the platform and we are attracting more users by our numbers. It's all about adoption. because we’re a just fart in Sahara in comparison, both in numbers of people and in revenue dollars So was Instagram when it began. If Ernest sold the platform tomorrow you wouldn't even notice it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] 0xtero@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago I’d just move to fedia.io and keep posting. My login isn’t worth very much permalink fedilink source parent [–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Buying one instance doesn't change anything though. Instagram was the whole kit and caboodle. It made a difference. Buying one instance, even a large won't doesn't give the same leverage. Plus, it doesn't destroy competition or anything. It's not equivalent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Wait for more tools and instances, and the leaders will emerge. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago And thinking any single instance can sway the entire fediverse, whether they're "leaders" or not is naive. You'd need to buy the top 100 instances at once to force any actual change in the fediverse and those top 100 were more than likely formed to avoid consolidation like that. You're worried about something that is so insanely difficult to happen and would have such a low ROI compared to Instagram and acquisitions like it. It's literally being shown that it's cheaper for a corporation to create its own. That's what Threads is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0xtero@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago I’d just move to fedia.io and keep posting. My login isn’t worth very much permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Buying one instance doesn't change anything though. Instagram was the whole kit and caboodle. It made a difference. Buying one instance, even a large won't doesn't give the same leverage. Plus, it doesn't destroy competition or anything. It's not equivalent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Wait for more tools and instances, and the leaders will emerge. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago And thinking any single instance can sway the entire fediverse, whether they're "leaders" or not is naive. You'd need to buy the top 100 instances at once to force any actual change in the fediverse and those top 100 were more than likely formed to avoid consolidation like that. You're worried about something that is so insanely difficult to happen and would have such a low ROI compared to Instagram and acquisitions like it. It's literally being shown that it's cheaper for a corporation to create its own. That's what Threads is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Wait for more tools and instances, and the leaders will emerge. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago And thinking any single instance can sway the entire fediverse, whether they're "leaders" or not is naive. You'd need to buy the top 100 instances at once to force any actual change in the fediverse and those top 100 were more than likely formed to avoid consolidation like that. You're worried about something that is so insanely difficult to happen and would have such a low ROI compared to Instagram and acquisitions like it. It's literally being shown that it's cheaper for a corporation to create its own. That's what Threads is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago And thinking any single instance can sway the entire fediverse, whether they're "leaders" or not is naive. You'd need to buy the top 100 instances at once to force any actual change in the fediverse and those top 100 were more than likely formed to avoid consolidation like that. You're worried about something that is so insanely difficult to happen and would have such a low ROI compared to Instagram and acquisitions like it. It's literally being shown that it's cheaper for a corporation to create its own. That's what Threads is. permalink fedilink source parent