I assume there must be a reason why sign language is superior but I genuinely don't know why.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’m not American but it’s suggested that learning a sign language and a ‘spoken’ language at the same time can slow the acquisition of both.

We see it in kids with two ‘spoken’ languages too but I believe to a lesser extent.

If I had a deaf kid I would teach them both but I understand the choices of parents that don’t do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    What in the world? It’s commonly understood that children learn the fastest and if you want to learn multiple languages, it’s best learned early..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    You've got mixed up there. If you plan to learn multiple languages then it is beneficial to learn as a child but even similar languages, like English and French, can cause issues communicating when young. When learning vastly different languages especially when one is written and one signed it causes a lot of issues. This can leave a deaf child struggling to communicate for a time.

    Often deaf parents will choose to stick to sign first.

  • source
  • parent