Videos

14085 readers

190 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

Videos only
Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article.
Don't be a jerk
No advertising
Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1279

Cloudflare Employee records her final meeting where HR tries to fire her (ody.sh)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

406 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I can’t give more approval for this woman, she handled everything so well.

The backstory is that Cloudflare overhired and wanted to reduce headcount, rightsize, whatever terrible HR wording you choose. Instead of admitting that this was a layoff, which would grant her things like severance and unemployment - they tried to tell her that her performance was lacking.

And for most of us (myself included) we would angrily accept it and trash the company online. Not her, she goes directly against them. It of course doesn’t go anywhere because HR is a bunch of robots with no emotions that just parrot what papa company tells them to, but she still says what all of us wish we did.

(Warning, if you've ever been laid off this is a bit enraging and can bring up some feelings)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

For what it’s worth, in most cases, “with cause” is misunderstood. “Fired with cause” on UI’s end typically means the employee was fired for something egregious and/or illegal. Stealing company property, committing fraud using company resources, gross negligence leading to someone getting injured, etc… Simple underperformance isn’t typically enough to exclude you from claiming UI.

Even though people will colloquially say that being let go for underperformance is “with cause”. It’s typically not correct, and won’t hold water if the former employee decides to appeal the initial UI denial. But companies have a vested interest in supporting that colloquialism, because if people believe they don’t deserve UI then they won’t try to claim it, (or won’t try to appeal it when their initial claim is denied,) which keeps companies’ UI payments low.