Technology

hideshow 5 child comments

parent

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 2 years ago*

Edit: Sorry, meant to reply to the comment above you!

They're not really leases either. Leases last for a defined period of time, like "one year," or they renew at regular intervals, like "monthly." "Pay up front and we'll let you keep this license for either forever or until we decide to revoke it without notifying you" isn't the same thing.

parent

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Apple uses the word “Get” for free things and simply displays the price on the button of paid apps. No mention of the nature of the transaction. That’s in the Germa of agreement you “read” and agreed to.

parent

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Same thing that Sony did with movies on the PS. “You’re buying a revocable licence”

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago

Pretty much all the big tech firms have done this. The problem is we only blame the middlemen. We blame Sony or Amazon, or Google or whoever. But the companies providing the licenses for them to "sell" are a big part of the problem. And nobody ever wants to listen when I say this but they should be on the hook too. Like, I appreciate that it's messed up to have your purchased media shadow ganked. But at the same time it's fucked up to have the licensing agreements be what they are to start with and that's absolutely on companies that own the rights to digital media. Who continue to lobby to maintain the status quo.

parent

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

All they will do is call it purshaces or some other made up bs