The claim is a major departure for the service, which has long been known as a destination for posting short snippets of text.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 116 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Lol, twitter was brilliant when it was 144 character text messages. Then it got ruined by adding photos. Now it is going the rest of the way down the tubes by becoming becoming video first. Ugh.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Oh yea back when it needed that limit because the whole point was to text it over SMS and you could post with any SMS capable phone lol

    That was fun and unique, now it's just...boring? Just another social media site, it's only defining thing is it's (declining) size and reach

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    SMS was the original reason, but the side effect of forcing people to condense their thoughts into a couple sentences was pretty wonderful. Especially for an open ended community where anyone can talk about anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I disagree with you simply because brevity is nice but not at the expense of nuance. Having to try to follow a string of tweets because one simply can't suffice is awful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't understand the difficulty, the series of tweets are all replies to the previous tweet in the chain. Where's the difficulty?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Likewise I don't understand the difficulty in reading more than 140 characters.

    But I've never used Twitter so when I experience the platform it's through screen caps of tweets. Instead of having paragraphs and cohesive formatting it reads like a programmer who writes code all in one line. Sure, it can be done and it can be read but it's fucking awful that it isn't formatted correctly so that it is more clear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's formatted how you'd expect if you've a timeline on anything, most recent at the top though, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Thats not formatting. That's like reading a book transcribed on post-it notes and calling it a format. It can be ordered, yes but I'm talking about paragraphs and complete sentences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Wonderful in theory, but in practice it's a dumpster fire. Quick, mainstreamm-acceptable takes are incentived, and nuanced, alternative viewpoints are nearly impossible.

    If it were all for hobby stuff, it would be fine, but when this is how most people get their news, it's not good.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    And with this brilliant move they are going to increase bandwidth and storage expenses. There’s a reason why it’s so hard to compete with YouTube.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Typo. Was supposed to swipe “storage expenses”.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments