โฒ 253 โผ What are some things that Linux can't do, but Windows can? (lemmy.zip) submitted 2 years ago by Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml 535 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[โ] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) They sell support more than anything permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) They have a fair amount of features, like satellite permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) I really like RedHat's product line as a way to move a business towards the FOSS ecosystem. I really wish they hadn't done their enshitfitcation of their products, but even after that they are still better than most enterprise alternatives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah we are looking to replace them ourselves tbh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) I make sure to include OpenEL as the spec we are building on instead of RHEL. I like the architecture, just not the liability their non-foss policies put on us. We got hit by HashiCorps license change too, rough bit of time to be honest. Who are you looking at? Suse and Rancher are two I am keeping an eye on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* We are an MSSP so it's a bit different. Since we can offload license costs to customers and as long as they prefer having this party support and it's not losing us bids we are ok. But we have been looking at Ubuntu and CentOS previously, the main issue is how to replace Satellite. For Kubernetes we run on k3OS permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) They have a fair amount of features, like satellite permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) I really like RedHat's product line as a way to move a business towards the FOSS ecosystem. I really wish they hadn't done their enshitfitcation of their products, but even after that they are still better than most enterprise alternatives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah we are looking to replace them ourselves tbh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) I make sure to include OpenEL as the spec we are building on instead of RHEL. I like the architecture, just not the liability their non-foss policies put on us. We got hit by HashiCorps license change too, rough bit of time to be honest. Who are you looking at? Suse and Rancher are two I am keeping an eye on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* We are an MSSP so it's a bit different. Since we can offload license costs to customers and as long as they prefer having this party support and it's not losing us bids we are ok. But we have been looking at Ubuntu and CentOS previously, the main issue is how to replace Satellite. For Kubernetes we run on k3OS permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) I really like RedHat's product line as a way to move a business towards the FOSS ecosystem. I really wish they hadn't done their enshitfitcation of their products, but even after that they are still better than most enterprise alternatives. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah we are looking to replace them ourselves tbh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) I make sure to include OpenEL as the spec we are building on instead of RHEL. I like the architecture, just not the liability their non-foss policies put on us. We got hit by HashiCorps license change too, rough bit of time to be honest. Who are you looking at? Suse and Rancher are two I am keeping an eye on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* We are an MSSP so it's a bit different. Since we can offload license costs to customers and as long as they prefer having this party support and it's not losing us bids we are ok. But we have been looking at Ubuntu and CentOS previously, the main issue is how to replace Satellite. For Kubernetes we run on k3OS permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah we are looking to replace them ourselves tbh permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) I make sure to include OpenEL as the spec we are building on instead of RHEL. I like the architecture, just not the liability their non-foss policies put on us. We got hit by HashiCorps license change too, rough bit of time to be honest. Who are you looking at? Suse and Rancher are two I am keeping an eye on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* We are an MSSP so it's a bit different. Since we can offload license costs to customers and as long as they prefer having this party support and it's not losing us bids we are ok. But we have been looking at Ubuntu and CentOS previously, the main issue is how to replace Satellite. For Kubernetes we run on k3OS permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) I make sure to include OpenEL as the spec we are building on instead of RHEL. I like the architecture, just not the liability their non-foss policies put on us. We got hit by HashiCorps license change too, rough bit of time to be honest. Who are you looking at? Suse and Rancher are two I am keeping an eye on. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* We are an MSSP so it's a bit different. Since we can offload license costs to customers and as long as they prefer having this party support and it's not losing us bids we are ok. But we have been looking at Ubuntu and CentOS previously, the main issue is how to replace Satellite. For Kubernetes we run on k3OS permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* We are an MSSP so it's a bit different. Since we can offload license costs to customers and as long as they prefer having this party support and it's not losing us bids we are ok. But we have been looking at Ubuntu and CentOS previously, the main issue is how to replace Satellite. For Kubernetes we run on k3OS permalink fedilink source parent