you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Which clearly is money they have considering how much publishers pour onto that fire, tbh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Probably, but they raised the cost for us, so we should do the same to them. Maybe we would eventually reach a point when companies using that product decide that it's not longer worth it to pay X amount of money for a game to be "protected" for only Y amount of days. I think that should be the goal. To raise the costs, to make DRM as impractical for them as possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments